SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/59877"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/59877" > Grazing impact of O...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Tönnesson, Kajsa,1971Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för marin ekologi,Department of Marine Ecology (author)

Grazing impact of Oikopleura dioica and copepods on an autumn plankton community

  • Article/chapterEnglish2005

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Informa UK Limited,2005

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/59877
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/59877URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000500396435DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Copepods and appendicularians are major grazers in the pelagic environment. They have different retention efficiencies for prey and may therefore exert a variable grazing pressure on the spectrum of pico- to micro-plankton. We determined clearance rates of both groups at one station during 24 h in the Gullmar fjord, west Sweden, in autumn 1999. Total potential prey biomass ranged from 75 mu g C l(-1) at the surface to 14 mu g C l(-1) at 30 m with a dominance of larger dinoflagellates (10-25 mu m athecate species and Gymnodinium /Gyrodinium sp.) and the pennate diatom Pseudo -nitzschia sp. Grazer biomass was dominated by copepods (Acartia clausi, Paracalanus parvus) and appendicularians (Oikopleura dioica). O. dioica showed non-selective clearance rates of 0.7-1.8 ml mu g C-1 h(-1) on most diatoms, flagellates and ciliates, whereas Pseudo -nitzschia sp. and dinoflagellates and ciliates > 25 mu m were not removed by O. dioica. Appendicularian grazing impact was 0.06% d(-1) on the phytoplankton and 0.4% d(-1) on bacterial biomass. Despite a seven-fold higher biomass, the grazing impact of copepods on phytoplankton biomass was only 0.28% d(-1) indicating that O. dioica had a proportionally greater impact and, in contrast to copepods, also utilised bacteria. The low observed grazing impact was due to a low grazer biomass and a prey community largely unavailable to the investigated grazers.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Maar, M. (author)
  • Vargas, C. (author)
  • Moller, E. F. (author)
  • Satapoomin, S. (author)
  • Zervoudaki, S. (author)
  • Christou, E. (author)
  • Giannakourou, A. (author)
  • Sell, AnneGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för marin ekologi,Department of Marine Ecology (author)
  • Petersen, J. K. (author)
  • Nielsen, T. G. (author)
  • Tiselius, Peter,1958Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för marin ekologi,Department of Marine Ecology(Swepub:gu)xtispe (author)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för marin ekologi (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Marine Biology Research: Informa UK Limited1:5, s. 365-3731745-10001745-1019

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view