SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:hhs.se:1165672430006056"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:hhs.se:1165672430006056" > Markets for Promoti...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Özbek, NurgülStockholm School of Economics,Handelshögskolan i Stockholm (author)

Markets for Promoting Innovation in Health Care? : A Market Practice Study of Public Procurement of Innovation (PPI)

  • Article/chapterEnglish2023

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Curitiba PR: Universidade Federal do Paraná Setor de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas,2023
  • electronicrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:hhs.se:1165672430006056
  • https://research.hhs.se/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Markets-for-Promoting-Innovation-in-Health/991001547699606056URI
  • https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i5.93604DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Subject category:vet swepub-contenttype

Notes

  • http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
  • This article critically analyzes public procurement of innovation (PPI) as an instance of using markets or market-like aspects as a means to resolve public concerns. It reports findings from a case of procuring radiation therapy equipment for a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. By extending a line of literature built on economic sociology as well as science and technology studies (STS), the study elaborates on public actors' efforts in framing markets to promote innovation. The case illustrates how the participating actors constructed the notion of innovativeness to be introduced into health care as means of addressing various public concerns. It also reveals the intended—and unintended— consequences of PPI as manifested in various actors' claims on the value of PPI realized in practice. The study suggests that it is extremely difficult to frame a market for the realization of innovation via procurement as a policy instrument because we cannot predict the ultimate impacts of devices and practices employed in such initiatives. By formulating a practice-based critique of PPI, our study invites important questions about the potentiality of such instruments for governing innovation without delimiting their consequences to the successor failure dichotomy as prescribed in predefined tools and strategies.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Johansson Krafve, LinusStockholm School of Economics,Handelshögskolan i Stockholm(Swepub:hhs)4307@hhs.se (author)
  • Kjellberg, HansStockholm School of Economics,Handelshögskolan i Stockholm(Swepub:hhs)222@hhs.se (author)
  • Sjögren, EbbaStockholm School of Economics,Handelshögskolan i Stockholm(Swepub:hhs)905@hhs.se (author)
  • Handelshögskolan i StockholmStockholm School of Economics (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Novation : Critical Studies of Innovation: Curitiba PR: Universidade Federal do Paraná Setor de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, s. 86-1142562-7147

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view