SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:05a280d0-4b98-42da-9130-bb794cb2897c"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:05a280d0-4b98-42da-9130-bb794cb2897c" > Spatial analyses of...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices

Asman, P (author)
Skåne University Hospital
Heijl, A (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Oftalmologi (Malmö),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Ophthalmology (Malmö),Lund University Research Groups,Skåne University Hospital
Rootzén, H (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Matematisk statistik,Matematikcentrum,Institutioner vid LTH,Lunds Tekniska Högskola,Mathematical Statistics,Centre for Mathematical Sciences,Departments at LTH,Faculty of Engineering, LTH
 (creator_code:org_t)
1992
1992
English.
In: Acta Ophthalmologica. - 0001-639X. ; 70:5, s. 86-679
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Interpretation of numeric automated threshold visual field results is often difficult. A large amount of data is obtained for every single field tested. Various approaches to summarize this data have been suggested, most commonly the mean and standard deviation of departures from age-corrected normal threshold values. These visual field indices differ substantially from subjective field interpretation where spatial relationships are important. We have previously devised two methods for automated field interpretation which take spatial information into account--regional up-down comparisons and arcuate cluster analysis. We now studied the merits of using these new spatial methods and compared them to traditional visual field indices for discrimination between normal and glaucomatous field results. Central static 30 degree field results in 101 eyes of 101 normal subjects and 101 eyes of 101 patients with glaucoma were discriminated using logistic regression analysis. The best field classification was obtained with a spatial visual field model combining up-down differences and arcuate clusters. The advantages of the spatial model were confirmed in an independent material of 163 eyes of 163 normal subjects and 76 eyes of 76 patients with glaucoma where eyes with large field defects had been removed. In this material the spatial model gave 87% sensitivity and 83% specificity while the best non-spatial model gave 82% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Visual field interpretation in glaucoma may be significantly enhanced if detection is focused on circumscribed field loss rather than on averages of differential light sensitivities and similar indices which do not take spatial relationships into consideration.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Oftalmologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Ophthalmology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cluster Analysis
Female
Glaucoma/physiopathology
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Likelihood Functions
Male
Middle Aged
Random Allocation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sensory Thresholds
Vision Disorders/physiopathology
Visual Field Tests/methods
Visual Fields

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Asman, P
Heijl, A
Rootzén, H
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Ophthalmology
Articles in the publication
Acta Ophthalmolo ...
By the university
Lund University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view