Search: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:24c0c2c2-0354-4a19-bf77-9e8f31f96976" >
Comparative cytolog...
Comparative cytological and histological assessment of 828 primary soft tissue and bone lesions, and proposal for a system for reporting soft tissue cytopathology
-
- Köster, Jan (author)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Genetiska avvikelser i mjukdelstumörer,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,The genetics of soft tissue tumors,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital
-
- Ghanei, Iman (author)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Ortopedisk sarkomforskning,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Orthopaedic Sarcoma Research,Lund University Research Groups,Skåne University Hospital
-
- Domanski, Henryk A. (author)
- Skåne University Hospital
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2020-10-17
- 2021
- English 13 s.
-
In: Cytopathology. - : Wiley. - 0956-5507 .- 1365-2303. ; 32:1, s. 7-19
- Related links:
-
http://dx.doi.org/10... (free)
-
show more...
-
https://onlinelibrar...
-
https://lup.lub.lu.s...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology and core needle biopsies (CNBs) in a series of primary soft tissue and bone lesions and to test a possible system for reporting results of FNA cytology of soft tissue lesion. Methods: This retrospective study encompassed 828 primary soft tissue and bone lesions, analysed with FNA, CNB and/or surgical specimen in order to perform sensitivity/specificity as well as accuracy analyses. The series was then used to test a system for reporting soft tissue cytopathology with six categories and the risk of malignancy in each category was calculated. Results: With a malignant diagnosis defined as positive test result, FNA and CNB analysis showed sensitivity of 87% and 94%, respectively, and specificity of 89% and 95%, respectively. FNA and CNB analyses identified the correct histopathological entity of the examined lesion in 55% and 66%, respectively. The risk of malignancy within the tested categories was non-diagnostic 42%, non-neoplastic 0%, atypia of unknown significance 46%, neoplasm benign 3%, neoplasm of unknown malignant potential 27%, suspicious for malignancy 72% and malignant 97%. Conclusion: FNA cytology is a suitable tool to determine the malignant potential of a sampled soft tissue/bone lesion but is inferior to CNB in defining the correct entity. A standardised reporting system might improve the clinical management of patients with soft tissue tumours examined primarily by FNA cytology.
Subject headings
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- biopsy
- bone neoplasms
- classification
- core needle
- fine needle
- sarcoma
- soft tissue neoplasms
Publication and Content Type
- art (subject category)
- ref (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database