SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:45b32e58-7b64-41da-9b1e-91a322311a37"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:45b32e58-7b64-41da-9b1e-91a322311a37" > Establishing meanin...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Establishing meaning recall and meaning recognition vocabulary knowledge as distinct psychometric constructs in relation to reading proficiency

Stewart, Jeffrey (author)
Tokyo University of Science
Gyllstad, Henrik (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Språkinlärning,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Språk, Kognition och Discourse@Lund (SKD@L),Engelska,Avdelningen för engelska,Sektion 4,Språk- och litteraturcentrum,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,LAMiNATE (Language Acquisition, Multilingualism, and Teaching),Language Acquisition,Lund University Research Groups,Language, Cognition and Discourse@Lund (LCD@L),English Studies,Division of English Studies,Section 4,Centre for Languages and Literature,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,LAMiNATE (Language Acquisition, Multilingualism, and Teaching)
Nicklin, Christopher (author)
Rikkyo University
show more...
McLean, Stuart (author)
Kindai University
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
English.
In: Language Testing. - 1477-0946. ; 41:1, s. 89-108
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The purpose of this paper is to (a) establish whether meaning recall and meaning recognition item formats test psychometrically distinct constructs of vocabulary knowledge which measure separate skills, and, if so, (b) determine whether each construct possesses unique properties predictive of L2 reading proficiency. Factor analyses and hierarchical regression were conducted on results derived from the two vocabulary item formats in order to test this hypothesis. Theresults indicated that although the two-factor model had better fit and meaning recall and meaning recognition can be considered distinct psychometrically, discriminant validity between the two factors is questionable. In hierarchical regression models, meaning recognition knowledge did not make a statistically significant contribution to explaining reading proficiency over meaningrecall knowledge. However, when the roles were reversed, meaning recall did make a significant contribution to the model beyond the variance explained by meaning recognition alone.The results suggest that meaning recognition does not tap into unique aspects of vocabulary knowledge and provide empirical support for meaning recall as a superior predictor of reading proficiency for research purposes.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap -- Pedagogik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences -- Pedagogy (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Meaning recall
meaning recognition
reading
TOEIC
vocabulary testing

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Stewart, Jeffrey
Gyllstad, Henrik
Nicklin, Christo ...
McLean, Stuart
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Educational Scie ...
and Pedagogy
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Psychology
Articles in the publication
Language Testing
By the university
Lund University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view