SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:7e7bdf46-11b6-478d-b073-a64135f5abd3"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:7e7bdf46-11b6-478d-b073-a64135f5abd3" > Synthesis of highbu...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Eeraerts, MaximeWashington State University (author)

Synthesis of highbush blueberry pollination research reveals region-specific differences in the contributions of honeybees and wild bees

  • Article/chapterEnglish2023

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2023
  • 12 s.

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:7e7bdf46-11b6-478d-b073-a64135f5abd3
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/7e7bdf46-11b6-478d-b073-a64135f5abd3URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14516DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:for swepub-publicationtype
  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype

Notes

  • Highbush blueberry production has expanded worldwide in recent decades. To safeguard future yields, it is essential to understand if insect pollination is limiting current blueberry production and which insects contribute to pollination in different production regions. We present a systematic review including a set of meta-analyses on insect-mediated pollination in highbush blueberry. We summarize the geographic distribution of research, the abundance of different pollinator taxa and their relative pollination contributions. Using raw data from 21 studies, totalling 496 site replicates, we determine the degree of pollination service and pollen limitation (i.e. combining open pollination levels with experimental bagged and/or hand pollination treatments), as well as the contribution of honeybees and wild bees to pollination (i.e. observational, open pollination). Most studies originate from North America, focusing on only a few cultivars. Honeybees are the dominant pollinator, and wild bees are occasionally abundant. Wild bees are more efficient pollinators on a single-visit basis compared to honeybees, which increases their relative pollination contribution compared to their relative abundance. Insect-mediated pollination services increased blueberry fruit set, berry weight and seed set (R2 values: 64.8%, 75.9% and 75.2% respectively). We often detected pollen limitation, indicated by an increase in fruit set, berry weight and seed set (R2: 10.1%, 18.2% and 21.5%, respectively), with additional hand pollination. Increasing visitation of honeybees and wild bees contributed to blueberry pollination by increasing fruit set (R2: 5.4% and 3.5%), berry weight (R2: 6.5% and 2.8%) and seed set (R2: 6.4% and 3.8%) respectively. Bee contributions to fruit set and berry weight were variable across regions. Synthesis and application: A diverse community of insects, primarily bees, contributes to highbush blueberry pollination and yield. However, pollination deficits are common. The finding that both honeybees and wild bees enhance pollination highlights the possibility of adopting different management strategies that utilize honeybees, wild bees or both depending on the specific context and region. This further emphasizes the general importance of conserving pollinator health and diversity. Our synthesis highlights data gaps and areas for future research to better understand the pollination contribution of different pollinators to crops that are expanding globally.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • DeVetter, Lisa W.Washington State University (author)
  • Batáry, PéterInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HAS (author)
  • Ternest, John J.University of Florida (author)
  • Mallinger, RachelUniversity of Florida (author)
  • Arrington, MatthewBrigham Young University (author)
  • Benjamin, Faye E.Hofstra University (author)
  • Blaauw, Brett R.University of Georgia (author)
  • Campbell, Joshua W.United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (author)
  • Cavigliasso, PabloNational Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) (author)
  • Daniels, Jaret C.Florida Museum Natural History (author)
  • de Groot, G. ArjenWageningen University (author)
  • Ellis, James D.University of Florida (author)
  • Gibbs, JasonUniversity of Manitoba (author)
  • Goldstein, LaurenMichigan State University (author)
  • Hoffman, George D.Oregon State University (author)
  • Kleijn, DavidWageningen University (author)
  • Melathopoulos, AndonyOregon State University (author)
  • Miller, Sharron Z.Michigan State University (author)
  • Montero-Castaño, AnaUniversity of Guelph (author)
  • Naranjo, Shiala M.University of Florida (author)
  • Nicholson, Charlie C.Lund University,Lunds universitet,Biodiversitet,Biologiska institutionen,Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten,BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate,Centrum för miljö- och klimatvetenskap (CEC),Biodiversity,Department of Biology,Faculty of Science,Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)(Swepub:lu)ch6667ni (author)
  • Perkins, Jacquelyn A.Michigan State University (author)
  • Rao, SujayaUniversity of Minnesota (author)
  • Raine, Nigel E.University of Guelph (author)
  • Reilly, James R.Rutgers University: The State University of New Jersey (author)
  • Ricketts, Taylor H.University of Vermont (author)
  • Rogers, EmmaWashington State University (author)
  • Isaacs, RufusMichigan State University (author)
  • Washington State UniversityInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HAS (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Journal of Applied Ecology60:12, s. 2528-25390021-8901

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view