SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:ebac97b3-483d-40c0-b3ff-eeee4d306993"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:ebac97b3-483d-40c0-b3ff-eeee4d306993" > Are financial incen...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Are financial incentives more effective than health campaigns to quit smoking? A community-randomised smoking cessation trial in Denmark

Pisinger, Charlotta (author)
University of Copenhagen,Frederiksberg Hospital
Toxværd, Cecilie Goltermann (author)
Frederiksberg Hospital
Rasmussen, Mette (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Kliniskt Centrum för Hälsofrämjande Vård,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Clinical Health Promotion Centre,Lund University Research Groups,Frederiksberg Hospital
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2022
2022
English.
In: Preventive Medicine. - : Elsevier BV. - 0091-7435. ; 154
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The aim of this community-randomised smoking cessation (SC) trial was to investigate both recruitment and SC-rates in three municipalities offering financial incentives (FIM) to smokers who stop smoking when attending a municipal SC-program and compare these with three municipalities investing in a campaign (CAM) that should encourage smokers to use the SC-program. Furthermore, in a non-randomised matched control design we investigated whether there was a difference in recruitment and SC-rates in the three FIM and the three CAM, comparing each with three matched control municipalities (MCM). Each municipality received approx. $16,000. The FIM rewarded persons who were abstinent when attending the municipal SC-program. The CAM spent the money on a campaign recruiting smokers to the SC-program. Two of three FIM were only partly active in recruiting smokers in the intervention year 2018. An intention-to-treat (ITT) approach was used in analyses. Complete case analyses and multiple imputation were used to address loss to follow-up. No difference in recruitment was found between the CAM and the FIM (p = 0.954), in adjusted analyses. In ITT analyses, FIM achieved significantly higher odds of validated abstinence from smoking at one-year follow-up (OR (95%CI): 1.63(1.1–2.4)), but not of self-reported continuous abstinence after six months than CAM. Compared with no intervention, campaigns increased the recruitment of smokers to the SC-program while financial incentives increased six months abstinence rates. In a randomised trial, no difference was demonstrated in the effect of financial incentives and campaigns to recruit smokers to a SC-program and financial incentives seemed superior to help smokers staying smoke-free for a year. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov ID: NCT03849092.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Campaigns
Community trial
Financial incentives
Randomised trial
Smoking cessation

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Pisinger, Charlo ...
Toxværd, Cecilie ...
Rasmussen, Mette
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Health Sciences
and Public Health Gl ...
Articles in the publication
Preventive Medic ...
By the university
Lund University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view