SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:eeb15c1f-a2de-4e6e-a06b-e603e6bda871"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:eeb15c1f-a2de-4e6e-a06b-e603e6bda871" > Metaforer och mater...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Björck, AmelieLund University,Lunds universitet,Litteraturvetenskap,Avdelningen för litteraturvetenskap,Sektion 2,Språk- och litteraturcentrum,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,Comparative Literature,Division of Comparative Literature,Section 2,Centre for Languages and Literature,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology (author)

Metaforer och materialiseringar. Om apor hos Vladimir Nabokov och Sara Stridsberg

  • Article/chapterSwedish2013

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2013

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:eeb15c1f-a2de-4e6e-a06b-e603e6bda871
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3972756URI
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-27754URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:Swedish
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype

Varying forms of title

  • Metaphors and Materializations. On the Apes and Monkeys in Vladimir Nabokov and Sara Stridsberg

Notes

  • By tradition the humanities have been anthropocentrically focused on the lives of human beings in arts and literature. The limited analysis of what other species do in literature – and of the different relations between humans and animals that are represented – has sustained the notion of a hierachical divide between humans and other species, thereby reducing the ethical potential of literature to resist that dualism. The growing field of human–animal studies proposes that we return to our artefacts and epistemologies, with new attention to human–animal relations. Inspired by this movement, forefronted by scholars such as Cary Wolfe and Sara McHugh, this article offers a comparative reading of Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita (1955) and Sara Stridsberg’s Darling River (2010). In Lolita Nabokov makes frequent use of animal and especially monkey metaphors, and carries out an ongoing animalization of his characters. In Stridsberg’s novel, which is written as a kind of hypertext of Lolita, Nabokov’s animalizations are interestingly molded and materialized into one physical creature: the caged schimpanzee Ester. The central concern of the study is to understand the process and effects of this materialization. I argue that the consequential reorientation of the reader to a non-hierarchical species discourse is a major ethical feat of the novel.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • LitteraturvetenskapAvdelningen för litteraturvetenskap (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap:1, s. 5-201104-05562001-094X

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Björck, Amelie
About the subject
HUMANITIES
HUMANITIES
and Languages and Li ...
HUMANITIES
HUMANITIES
and Languages and Li ...
and General Literary ...
Articles in the publication
Tidskrift för li ...
By the university
Lund University
Södertörn University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view