SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:131694603"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:131694603" > Improved ischemic s...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Improved ischemic stroke outcome prediction using model estimation of outcome probability: the THRIVE-c calculation

Flint, AC (author)
Rao, VA (author)
Chan, SL (author)
show more...
Cullen, SP (author)
Faigeles, BS (author)
Smith, WS (author)
Bath, PM (author)
Wahlgren, N (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Ahmed, N (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Donnan, GA (author)
Johnston, SC (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-06-04
2015
English.
In: International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society. - : SAGE Publications. - 1747-4949. ; 10:6, s. 815-821
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE) score is a previously validated ischemic stroke outcome prediction tool. Although simplified scoring systems like the THRIVE score facilitate ease-of-use, when computers or devices are available at the point of care, a more accurate and patient-specific estimation of outcome probability should be possible by computing the logistic equation with patient-specific continuous variables. Methods We used data from 12 207 subjects from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive and the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke – Monitoring Study to develop and validate the performance of a model-derived estimation of outcome probability, the THRIVE-c calculation. Models were built with logistic regression using the underlying predictors from the THRIVE score: age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and the Chronic Disease Scale (presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or atrial fibrillation). Receiver operator characteristics analysis was used to assess model performance and compare the THRIVE-c model to the traditional THRIVE score, using a two-tailed Chi-squared test. Results The THRIVE-c model performed similarly in the randomly chosen development cohort ( n = 6194, area under the curve = 0·786, 95% confidence interval 0·774–0·798) and validation cohort ( n = 6013, area under the curve = 0·784, 95% confidence interval 0·772–0·796) ( P = 0·79). Similar performance was also seen in two separate external validation cohorts. The THRIVE-c model (area under the curve = 0·785, 95% confidence interval 0·777–0·793) had superior performance when compared with the traditional THRIVE score (area under the curve = 0·746, 95% confidence interval 0·737–0·755) ( P < 0·001). Conclusion By computing the logistic equation with patientspecific continuous variables in the THRIVE-c calculation, outcomes at the individual patient level are more accurately estimated. Given the widespread availability of computers and devices at the point of care, such calculations can be easily performed with a simple user interface.

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view