SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:133703334"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:133703334" > Cost-effectiveness ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Cost-effectiveness of a physician-nurse supplementary triage assessment team at an academic tertiary care emergency department

Cheng, I (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Castren, M (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Kiss, A (author)
show more...
Zwarenstein, M (author)
Brommels, M (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Mittmann, N (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-09-04
2016
English.
In: CJEM. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1481-8043 .- 1481-8035. ; 18:3, s. 191-204
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of physician-nurse supplementary triage assistance team (MDRNSTAT) from a hospital and patient perspective.MethodsThis was a cost-effectiveness evaluation of a cluster randomized control trial comparing the MDRNSTAT with nurse-only triage in the emergency department (ED) between the hours of 0800 and 1500. Cost was MDRNSTAT salary. Revenue was from Ontario’s Pay-for-Results and patient volume-case mix payment programs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was based on MDRNSTAT cost and three consequence assessments: 1) per additional patient-seen; 2) per physician initial assessment (PIA) hour saved; and 3) per ED length of stay (EDLOS) hour saved. Patient opportunity cost was determined. Patient satisfaction was quantified by a cost-benefit ratio. A sensitivity analysis extrapolating MDRNSTAT to different working hours, salary, and willingness-to-pay data was performed.ResultsThe added cost of the MDRNSTAT was $3,597.27 [$1,729.47 to ∞] per additional patient-seen, $75.37 [$67.99 to $105.30] per PIA hour saved, and $112.99 [$74.68 to $251.43] per EDLOS hour saved. From the hospital perspective, the cost-benefit ratio was 38.6 [19.0 to ∞] and net present value of –$447,996 [–$435,646 to –$459,900]. For patients, the cost-benefit ratio for satisfaction was 2.8 [2.3 to 4.6]. If MDRNSTAT performance were consistently implemented from noon to midnight, it would be more cost-effective.ConclusionsThe MDRNSTAT is not a cost-effective daytime strategy but appears to be more feasible during time periods with higher patient volume, such as late morning to evening.

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

  • CJEM (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Cheng, I
Castren, M
Kiss, A
Zwarenstein, M
Brommels, M
Mittmann, N
Articles in the publication
CJEM
By the university
Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view