SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:146614551"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:146614551" > Validity of Hip and...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Bezuidenhout, LKarolinska Institutet (author)

Validity of Hip and Ankle Worn Actigraph Accelerometers for Measuring Steps as a Function of Gait Speed during Steady State Walking and Continuous Turning

  • Article/chapterEnglish2021

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2021-05-01
  • MDPI AG,2021

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:146614551
  • http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:146614551URI
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093154DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of hip and ankle worn Actigraph GT3X+ (AG) accelerometers to measure steps as a function of gait speed. Additionally, the effect of the low frequency extension filter (LFEF) on the step accuracy was determined. Thirty healthy individuals walked straight and walked with continuous turns in different gait speeds. Number of steps were recorded with a hip and ankle worn AG, and with a Stepwatch (SW) activity monitor positioned around the right ankle, which was used as a reference for step count. The percentage agreement, interclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altmann plots were determined between the AG and the reference SW across gait speeds for the two walking conditions. The ankle worn AG with the default filter was the most sensitive for step detection at >0.6 m/s, whilst accurate step detection for gait speeds < 0.6 m/s were only observed when applying the LFEF. The hip worn AG with the default filter showed poor accuracy (12–78%) at gait speeds < 1.0 m/s whereas the accuracy increased to >87% for gait speeds < 1.0 m/s when applying the LFEF. Ankle worn AG was the most sensitive to measure steps at a vast range of gait speeds. Our results suggest that sensor placement and filter settings need to be taken into account to provide accurate estimates of step counts.

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Thurston, CKarolinska Institutet (author)
  • Hagstromer, MKarolinska Institutet (author)
  • Conradsson, DMKarolinska Institutet (author)
  • Karolinska Institutet (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland): MDPI AG21:91424-8220

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Bezuidenhout, L
Thurston, C
Hagstromer, M
Conradsson, DM
Articles in the publication
Sensors (Basel, ...
By the university
Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view