SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:147998869"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:147998869" > Differences in Peak...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Differences in Peak Oxygen Uptake in Bicycle Exercise Test Caused by Body Positions: A Meta-Analysis

Wan, XH (author)
Liu, C (author)
Olson, TP (author)
show more...
Chen, XK (author)
Lu, WH (author)
Jiang, W (author)
show less...
2021-10-11
2021
English.
In: Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 2297-055X. ; 8, s. 734687-
  • Research review (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: As demand for cardiopulmonary exercise test using a supine position has increased, so have the testing options. However, it remains uncertain whether the existing evaluation criteria for the upright position are suitable for the supine position. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the differences in peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) between upright and supine lower extremity bicycle exercise.Methods: We searched PubMed, Web Of Science and Embase from inception to March 27, 2021. Self-control studies comparing VO2peak between upright and supine were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a checklist adapted from published papers in this field. The effect of posture on VO2peak was pooled using random/fixed effects model.Results: This meta-analysis included 32 self-control studies, involving 546 participants (63% were male). 21 studies included only healthy people, 9 studies included patients with cardiopulmonary disease, and 2 studies included both the healthy and cardiopulmonary patients. In terms of study quality, most of the studies (n = 21, 66%) describe the exercise protocol, and we judged theVO2peak to be valid in 26 (81%) studies. Meta-analysis showed that the upright VO2peak exceeded the supine VO2peak [relative VO2peak: mean difference (MD) 2.63 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66-3.59, I2 = 56%, p < 0.05; absolute VO2peak: MD 0.18 L/min, 95% CI 0.10-0.26, I2 = 63%, p < 0.05). Moreover, subgroup analysis showed there was more pooled difference in healthy people (4.04 ml/kg/min or 0.22 L/min) than in cardiopulmonary patients (1.03 ml/kg/min or 0.12 L/min).Conclusion: VO2peak in the upright position is higher than that in supine position. However, whether this difference has clinical significance needs further verification.Systematic Review Registration: identifier, CRD42021233468.

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Wan, XH
Liu, C
Olson, TP
Chen, XK
Lu, WH
Jiang, W
Articles in the publication
Frontiers in car ...
By the university
Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view