Search: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:03f28ecc-937c-4421-8721-1052b9b1e1c3" >
Comparison of human...
Comparison of human body models in frontal crashes with reclined seatback
-
- Gepner, B. D. (author)
- University of Virginia
-
- Draper, D. (author)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
-
- Mroz, K. (author)
- Autoliv AB, Sweden
-
show more...
-
- Richardson, R. (author)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
-
- Östling, Martin (author)
- Autoliv AB, Sweden
-
- Pipkorn, Bengt, 1963 (author)
- Autoliv AB, Sweden,Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
-
- Forman, Jason (author)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
-
- Kerrigan, J. R. (author)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2019
- 2019
- English.
-
In: Conference proceedings International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury, IRCOBI. - 2235-3151. ; , s. 293-307
- Related links:
-
http://www.ircobi.or...
-
show more...
-
https://research.cha...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Reclined seating configurations, relevant to the future of Autonomous Driving Systems is likely to challenge the current state-of-the-art restraint systems. Human body models (HBM) offer an attractive tool to support the design process, however their validity in the reclined scenario remains questionable. The goal of this study is to compare the response of selected HBMs in the frontal, reclined scenario, while utilizing a new prototype restraint system. A sled model with a generic seat, 50 deg seatback recline angle and a prototype 3-point belt system was used in this study. Four different male HBMs were compared, the Global Human Body Model Consortium (GHBMC) simplified occupant model (GHBMC-S), the GHBMC detailed model (GHBMC-D), Total Human Model for Safety SAFER (THUMS-S) model, and THUMS-v5 model. All HBMs showed good pelvis engagement, except GHBMC-D that submarined under the lap belt. Additionally, large differences were observed in pelvis and lumbar spine response between GHBMC and THUMS family models. Since no relevant PMHS data is currently available, it is impossible to evaluate the biofidelity of these models in the reclined scenarios. Evaluating the relative biofidelity of these models can only be accomplished with experimental data capturing detailed 3D skeletal kinematics and all the boundary forces necessary for model evaluation.
Subject headings
- NATURVETENSKAP -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Bioinformatik (hsv//swe)
- NATURAL SCIENCES -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Bioinformatics (hsv//eng)
- TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER -- Maskinteknik -- Farkostteknik (hsv//swe)
- ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY -- Mechanical Engineering -- Vehicle Engineering (hsv//eng)
- TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Inbäddad systemteknik (hsv//swe)
- ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Embedded Systems (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- Submarining
- PMHS
- Recline
- HBM
- Restraint
Publication and Content Type
- kon (subject category)
- ref (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database