SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:0ecdf252-d834-42dc-86fc-26e27db6cde4"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:0ecdf252-d834-42dc-86fc-26e27db6cde4" > New definition for ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

New definition for dual-polarized antenna sensitivity

Carozzi, Tobia, 1966 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019
2019
English.
In: Proceedings of the 2019 21st International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications, ICEAA 2019. ; , s. 979-981
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Sensitivity is arguably the single most important defining characteristic of a radio telescope. This is because it sets the threshold for what sources can reasonably be detected. Intuitively, sensitivity is the noise level of an antenna referenced to measurements on the sky. So the lower it is, the easier one would expect to make detections of weak sources, and from this it would make sense to call it loosely the 'detection power' of telescopes. But this sensitivity concept does not take into account the polarization of the source or the polarization of the antenna itself, and could thus lead to problems. The traditionally used definition of sensitivity is namely based on single antennas. This antenna based sensitivity is derived assuming that the two polarized antennas that make up radio polarimeters are orthogonal and have identical amplitude gains. In practice these dual-polarized antennas will have different gains and exhibit polarization leakage due to nonorthogonality. To address these more realistic dual-polarized antennas, I introduce a new definition of dual-polarized (or full-polarization) antenna sensitivity. This new definition of sensitivity is a polarimetric generalization of the scalar, system equivalent flux density (SEFD). The new definition generalizes the total sensitivity, and also provides a quantity that represents sensitivity to purely polarized flux. Based on the new SEFD definition, I find that the intuitive notion that identical and orthogonal antennas should typically have better sensitivity than dissimilar, leaky antennas.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Fysik -- Atom- och molekylfysik och optik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Physical Sciences -- Atom and Molecular Physics and Optics (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Signalbehandling (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Signal Processing (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Annan elektroteknik och elektronik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Polarimeters
Detection power
Polarization
Antenna sensitivity

Publication and Content Type

kon (subject category)
ref (subject category)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Carozzi, Tobia, ...
About the subject
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Physical Science ...
and Atom and Molecul ...
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING AND ...
and Electrical Engin ...
and Signal Processin ...
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING AND ...
and Electrical Engin ...
and Other Electrical ...
Articles in the publication
By the university
Chalmers University of Technology

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view