SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:2b20115d-7b8b-44ac-969f-a7b4a9c19cd5"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:2b20115d-7b8b-44ac-969f-a7b4a9c19cd5" > Alternative marine ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Alternative marine fuels: Prospects based on multi-criteria decision analysis involving Swedish stakeholders

Hansson, Julia, 1978 (author)
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB,IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute,Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Månsson, Stina, 1991 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Brynolf, Selma, 1984 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show more...
Grahn, Maria, 1963 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2019
2019
English.
In: Biomass and Bioenergy. - : Elsevier BV. - 1873-2909 .- 0961-9534. ; 126, s. 159-173
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • There is a need for alternative marine fuels in order to reduce the environmental and climate impacts of shipping, in the short and long term. This study assesses the prospects for seven alternative fuels for the shipping sector in 2030, including biofuels, by applying a multi-criteria decision analysis approach that is based on the estimated fuel performance and on input from a panel of maritime stakeholders and by considering, explicitly, the influence of stakeholder preferences. Seven alternative marine fuels—liquefied natural gas (LNG), liquefied biogas (LBG), methanol from natural gas, renewable methanol, hydrogen for fuel cells produced from (i) natural gas or (ii) electrolysis based on renewable electricity, and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO)—and heavy fuel oil (HFO) as benchmark are included and ranked by ten performance criteria and their relative importance. The criteria cover economic, environmental, technical, and social aspects. Stakeholder group preferences (i.e., the relative importance groups assign to the criteria) influence the ranking of these options. For ship-owners, fuel producers, and engine manufacturers, economic criteria, in particular the fuel price, are the most important. These groups rank LNG and HFO the highest, followed by fossil methanol, and then various biofuels (LBG, renewable methanol, and HVO). Meanwhile, representatives from Swedish government authorities prioritize environmental criteria, specifically GHG emissions, and social criteria, specifically the potential to meet regulations, ranking renewable hydrogen the highest, followed by renewable methanol, and then HVO. Policy initiatives are needed to promote the introduction of renewable marine fuels.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap -- Miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences -- Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

biofuels
alternative fuels
analytic hierachy process multi-criteria decision making
shipping
sustainability assessment

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view