SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:54a026c3-713a-494e-a37a-3cb986cd9b83"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:54a026c3-713a-494e-a37a-3cb986cd9b83" > Drivers and barrier...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Drivers and barriers to energy-efficient technologies (EETs) in EU residential buildings

Camarasa, Clara, 1986 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Kumar Kalahasthi, Lokesh, 1988 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Rosado, Leonardo, 1975 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2021
2021
English.
In: Energy and Built Environment. - : Elsevier BV. - 2666-1233. ; 2:3, s. 290-301
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • To achieve carbon targets, the European Union (EU) aims to promote nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEB). To enable the necessary transition, technical solutions need to converge with socio-economic factors, such values and awareness of stakeholders involved in the decision-making process. In this light, the aim of this paper is to characterise perceived drivers and barriers to nine energy-efficient technologies (EET), according to key decision-makers' and persuaders of the technology selection in the EU residential building context. Results are collected across eight EU countries, i.e. Belgium (BE), Germany (DE), Spain (ES), France (FR), Italy (IT), Netherlands (NL), Poland (PL), and United Kingdom (UK). The stakeholders’ selected are architects, construction companies, engineers, installers and demand-side actors. Data from a multi-country survey is analysed to calculate the share of 15 drivers and 21 barriers (aggregated to 5 groups), being selected for each EET and country. The 5 groups considered to analyse drivers and barriers are environmental, technical, economic, social, legal. The perceived barriers and drivers were further studied for their association across the countries using the Pearson's Chi2 and a Cramer's V tests. The results demonstrate that across all EETs and countries, the technical and economic driver groups are perceived to have the highest potential to increase the implementation rate of EET. In terms of barriers, economic aspects are seen as the foremost reason that EET are not scaling faster. In both drivers and barriers legal aspects are the least often selected. In overall the barrier groups show significant variation across countries compared to driver groups. These findings provide an evidence-basis to better understand arguments in favour and against specific EETs and, in this way, support policy makers and other interested parties to increase the market share of the selected solutions.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Samhällsbyggnadsteknik -- Byggproduktion (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Civil Engineering -- Construction Management (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap -- Statsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science -- Political Science (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Energisystem (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Energy Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Energy efficiency
Technology diffusion
Residential building stock
Barriers
Technology selection
Drivers

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view