SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:997e1102-757d-4260-92c4-0a814f6f6243"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:997e1102-757d-4260-92c4-0a814f6f6243" > Assessing potential...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Assessing potential pesticide-related ecotoxicity impacts of food products across different functional units.

Nordborg, Maria, 1985 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Davis, Jennifer (author)
Cederberg, Christel, 1959 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show more...
Sonesson, Ulf (author)
Berndes, Göran, 1966 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2016
2016
English.
In: Book of Abstracts, 10th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food.
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The study aims to 1) demonstrate and apply a method for assessing the potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts due to pesticide use in the primary production associated with six food products (chicken fillet, minced pork, minced beef, drinking milk, pea soup and wheat bread), and 2) evaluate how five different functional units (FUs) influence the results. Pesticide emissions were inventoried using an extended, updated and site-specific version of the PestLCI v. 2.0.5 model. In the impact assessment, USEtox v. 2.01 was used. The results show that the choice of FU has little influence on the outcome: four out of five FUs yield the same ranking of the animal-based food products: impact potentials decrease in the order minced pork > chicken fillet > minced beef > milk. The plant-based food products score considerably lower than the animal-based food products, regardless of FU. Notably, impact potentials of beef are lower than of chicken and pork, regardless of FU, contrary to typical carbon footprint and land use results for meat products. We conclude that the choice of FU did not influence the ranking of animal vs. plant-based food products. Also, we conclude that carbon footprints are inadequate proxy indicators of ecotoxicity impacts of food products and that ecotoxicity impacts need to be considered specifically, alongside other important impact categories.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap -- Miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences -- Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

kon (subject category)
ref (subject category)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Nordborg, Maria, ...
Davis, Jennifer
Cederberg, Chris ...
Sonesson, Ulf
Berndes, Göran, ...
About the subject
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Earth and Relate ...
and Environmental Sc ...
Articles in the publication
By the university
Chalmers University of Technology

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view