SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:e379dc62-4263-44bc-8cd9-5fef7ef485e0"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:e379dc62-4263-44bc-8cd9-5fef7ef485e0" > Comparative Assessm...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Comparative Assessment of Zero CO2 Powertrain for Light Commercial Vehicles

Pipicelli, Michele (author)
Consiglo Nazionale Delle Richerche
Sedarsky, David, 1976 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Koopmans, Lucien, 1968 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show more...
Gimelli, Alfredo (author)
Universita Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico Ii,University of Naples Federico II
Di Blasio, G.D. (author)
Consiglo Nazionale Delle Richerche
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023
2023
English.
In: SAE Technical Papers. - 0148-7191 .- 2688-3627.
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The transport sector is experiencing a shift to zero-carbon powertrains driven by aggressive international policies aiming to fight climate change. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) will play the main role in passenger car applications, while diversified solutions are under investigation for the heavy-duty sector. Within this framework, Light Commercial Vehicles (LCVs) impact is not negligible and accountable for about 2.5% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Europe. In this regard, few LCV comparative assessments on green powertrains are available in the scientific literature and justified by the fact that several factors and limitations should be considered and addressed to define optimal powertrain solutions for specific use cases. The proposed research study deals with a comparative numerical assessment of different zero-carbon powertrain solutions for LCV. BEVs are compared to hydrogen-based fuel cells (FC) and internal combustion engines (ICE) powered vehicles. The analysis is conducted through specifically developed vehicle models. Vehicle performance in terms of energy efficiency, well-to-wheel GHG, range, payload, and total cost of ownership (TCO) are compared. Optimal powertrain configurations based on predefined vehicle ranges have been identified, and the impact of various cost scenarios has been analyzed. The most influencing factors on TCO have been identified, and a sensitivity analysis has been carried out. The numerical tool developed, and the methodology adopted allows the definition of the domains in which one solution prevails over the others in terms of vehicle range, fuel, and electricity cost.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Maskinteknik -- Energiteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Mechanical Engineering -- Energy Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Maskinteknik -- Farkostteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Mechanical Engineering -- Vehicle Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Energisystem (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Energy Systems (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Reglerteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Control Engineering (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

kon (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view