SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:eea4404b-e217-4d8a-ab1e-0a9c6383860c"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:eea4404b-e217-4d8a-ab1e-0a9c6383860c" > How Do Dietary Choi...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

How Do Dietary Choices Influence the Energy-System Cost of Stabilizing the Climate?

Bryngelsson, David, 1981 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Hedenus, Fredrik, 1976 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Johansson, Daniel, 1975 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show more...
Azar, Christian, 1969 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Wirsenius, Stefan, 1963 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017-02-05
2017
English.
In: Energies. - : MDPI AG. - 1996-1073 .- 1996-1073. ; 10:2
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • We investigate how different global dietary scenarios affect the constraints on, and costs of, transforming the energy system to reach a global temperature stabilization limit of 2 degrees C above the pre-industrial level. A global food and agriculture model, World Food Supply Model (WOFSUM), is used to create three dietary scenarios and to calculate the CH4 and N2O emissions resulting from their respective food-supply chains. The diets are: (i) a reference diet based on current trends; (ii) a diet with high (reference-level) meat consumption, but without ruminant products (i.e., no beef, lamb, or dairy, only pork and poultry); and (iii) a vegan diet. The estimated CH4 and N2O emissions from food production are fed into a coupled energy and climate-system optimization model to quantify the energy system implications of the different dietary scenarios, given a 2 degrees C target. The results indicate that a phase-out of ruminant products substantially increases the emission space for CO2 by about 250 GtC which reduces the necessary pace of the energy system transition and cuts the net present value energy-system mitigation costs by 25%, for staying below 2 degrees C. Importantly, the additional cost savings with a vegan diet--beyond those achieved with a phase-out of ruminant products--are marginal (only one additional percentage point). This means that a general reduction of meat consumption is a far less effective strategy for meeting the 2 degrees C target than a reduction of beef and dairy consumption.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Industriell bioteknik -- Bioenergi (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Industrial Biotechnology -- Bioenergy (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Energisystem (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Energy Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

environment
food choices
agriculture
management
meat
mitigation options
scenarios
emissions
Energy & Fuels
greenhouse-gas
dietary changes
climate change mitigation
potentials
energy system modelling

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

  • Energies (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view