Search: onr:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:111798" >
Gas Hydrates as a M...
-
Ahmadi Moghaddam, ElhamLinköpings universitet,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för energi och teknik,Department of Energy and Technology,Linköping University,Industriell miljöteknik,Tekniska fakulteten,Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Sweden
(author)
Gas Hydrates as a Means for Biogas and Biomethane Distribution
- Article/chapterEnglish2021
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
-
2021-04-07
-
Frontiers Media SA,2021
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:slubar.slu.se:111798
-
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/111798URI
-
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.568879DOI
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-175610URI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
Biomethane is receiving great attention as a renewable energy gas with lower environmental impacts and diversified sources of production. However, availability of gas infrastructure is an important factor in biomethane development and use. Biomethane can be distributed by the natural gas or local biogas grid. Biomethane can also be road-transported as compressed biomethane (CBG) or liquefied bio-methane (LBG). Biomethane could be distributed via gas hydration technology, where methane molecules are physically trapped within the crystalline structures of frozen host water molecules as gas hydrate compounds. Using life cycle assessment methodology, this study compared the energy performance and climate impact of two gas hydrate scenarios, biogas hydrate and biomethane hydrate, with that of a base case distributing biomethane as CBG. The technical system, from biogas upgrading, hydration, compression and road transport to filling station of biomethane as CBG, was included in the analysis. Results of this study show that distribution of biomethane as gas hydrates had a lower energy performance and higher climate impact than compressed biomethane distribution. The low energy performance was due to high electricity demand in hydrate formation and dissociation processes. The gas hydrate scenarios also had higher climate impacts as a result of high methane losses from hydrate formation and dissociationdissociation and emissions related to energy source use. Biogas upgrading to biomethane also significantly contributed to methane losses and climate impact of the scenarios studied.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Larsolle, AndersSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för energi och teknik,Department of Energy and Technology,Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Sweden(Swepub:slu)46907
(author)
-
Tidåker, PernillaSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för energi och teknik,Department of Energy and Technology,Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Sweden(Swepub:slu)49464
(author)
-
Nordberg, ÅkeSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för energi och teknik,Department of Energy and Technology,Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Sweden(Swepub:slu)50710
(author)
-
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitetInstitutionen för energi och teknik
(creator_code:org_t)
-
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
Related titles
-
In:Frontiers in Energy Research: Frontiers Media SA92296-598X
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database