SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:65364"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:65364" > Scientific Opinion ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Berg, LottaSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa (HMH),Department of Animal Environment and Health (author)

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of studies on the use of carbon dioxide for stunning rabbits

  • Article/chapterEnglish2015

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Wiley,2015
  • European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma,2024

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:slubar.slu.se:65364
  • https://res.slu.se/id/publ/65364URI
  • https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4022DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • The EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW Panel) was asked by the European Commission to deliver a scientific opinion on two studies concerned with the use of carbon dioxide for stunning rabbits. The European Commission had received from the Spanish authorities a report of a study entitled ‘Carbon dioxide stunning of rabbits' and another study entitled ‘Stunning of rabbits with carbon dioxide', provided as a complement to the first study. The latter was undertaken in a commercial abattoir where a commercial carbon dioxide stunner was installed. The results of electrocardiography and animal-based measures (nasal discomfort and vocalisation) produced in the experimental slaughterhouse study clearly indicated that the rabbits were subjected to pain and suffering prior to the loss of consciousness. The data presented do not describe stable, controlled or repeatable experimental conditions. The statistical tests used to analyse the data were not appropriate. The study in the commercial abattoir was not based on sound scientific conclusions resulting from the experimental slaughterhouse study. For all of these reasons, the submitted studies did not meet the minimum criteria for eligibility in the EFSA guidance on the assessment criteria for studies evaluating the effectiveness of stunning interventions. Therefore, they were not further assessed.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Vågsholm, IvarSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Inst för biomedicin och veterinär folkhälsovetenskap,Department of Biomedical Science and Veterinary Public Health(Swepub:slu)48570 (author)
  • Sveriges lantbruksuniversitetInstitutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa (HMH) (creator_code:org_t)
  • Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet

Related titles

  • In:EFSA Journal: Wiley131831-4732

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Berg, Lotta
Vågsholm, Ivar
About the subject
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
AGRICULTURAL SCI ...
and Veterinary Scien ...
and Clinical Science
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
AGRICULTURAL SCI ...
and Veterinary Scien ...
and Other Veterinary ...
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
AGRICULTURAL SCI ...
and Veterinary Scien ...
and Pathobiology
Articles in the publication
EFSA Journal
By the university
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view