SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:69111"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:69111" > What a forest? Whos...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

What a forest? Whose forest? Struggles over concepts and meanings in the debate about the conservation of the Bialowieza Forest in Poland

Blicharska, Malgorzata (author)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för vatten och miljö,Centrum för biologisk mångfald,Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment,Swedish Biodiversity Centre
 (creator_code:org_t)
 
Elsevier BV, 2015
2015
English.
In: Forest Policy and Economics. - : Elsevier BV. - 1389-9341 .- 1872-7050. ; 57, s. 22-30
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This paper addresses the long-standing debate over the conservation and management of the Bialowieza Forest in North-eastern Poland, frequently referred to as the last, large, close-to-natural, temperate, lowland forest in Europe. With the present research we aim to document how particular conceptualisations of "forest" shaped the debate and the fate of the Bialowieza Forest. Based on our reconstruction and analysis of argumentation, three dominant discourses could be distinguished, each offering different concepts of forest and people-forest relationships: 1. 'managerial' - with foresters presented as stewards of the forest, actively managing it for sustainable outcomes; 2. 'livelihood' - considering the forest as local heritage and underlining its role in fulfilling people's needs; and 3. 'primaeval' - highlighting the forest's intrinsic value and natural processes, being an international concern. The three discourses remained remarkably stable over the past two decades, but their status of institutionalisation evolved, which in turn influenced their hegemony and power. Importantly, our study demonstrates the active role of parties involved in the debate as they used particular concepts (their own, those of others or new ones) for strategic purposes. We conclude that both the achieved hegemony of a discourse and the particular ways by which its concepts are mobilised by actors may play a decisive role in shaping debate and its policy outcomes. We suggest that future research should focus more on the role of actors in strategically using particular forest-related concepts in concrete situations and to what effects. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Blicharska, Malg ...
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Other Social Sci ...
and Social Sciences ...
Articles in the publication
Forest Policy an ...
By the university
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view