| 1. |
- Borgquist, Rasmus, et al.
(författare)
-
An electrophysiologist perspective on risk stratification in heart failure: can better understanding of the condition of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system help?
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of Nuclear Medicine. - : Society of Nuclear Medicine. - 0161-5505 .- 2159-662X. ; 56:Suppl 4, s. 59-64
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Heart failure is often complicated by arrhythmias that can adversely affect the quality of life and increase the risk for sudden cardiac death. Current risk stratification strategies for sudden cardiac death in the heart failure patient are not ideal, with much potential for further refinement. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system has been shown to be associated with worsening heart failure as well as arrhythmic events. Recent advances in our understanding of the autonomic nervous system and new methods for quantification of the pathologic activation of the sympathetic nerves have triggered increasing interest in this field. This viewpoint focuses on the need for and challenges of risk stratification of sudden death in the heart failure patient and discusses the potential value of measuring sympathetic nervous system activity to better stratify risk and to select patients with heart failure for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.
|
|
| 2. |
- Chatterjee, Neal A, et al.
(författare)
-
Increasing sex differences in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- 2017
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1522-9645 .- 0195-668X. ; 38:19, s. 1485-1494
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: Previous studies have identified sex disparities in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), although the basis of underutilization in women remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess sex differences in patterns of CRT use with our without ICD.METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample database we identified 311 009 patients undergoing CRT implantation in the United States between 2006 and 2012. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between men and women undergoing CRT implantation, with special attention to clinical predictors of left ventricular reverse remodelling (CRT response, score range: 0-4) and reduced ICD efficacy (score range: 0-7). When compared to men, women undergoing CRT implantation were significantly more likely to have ≥ 3 predictors of CRT response (47.3 vs. 33.2%, P < 0.001) and less likely to have ≥3 predictors of reduced ICD efficacy (27.0 vs. 37.3%, P < 0.001). Despite this, men were significantly more likely to undergo CRT with ICD (CRT-D) as the type of CRT (88.6 vs. 80.1% of all CRT implants). Compared to those with the greatest likelihood of CRT response (score ≥ 3), those with the least likelihood of CRT response had a significant decreased odds of CRT-D implant (adj odds ratio 0.27 [0.24-0.31], P < 0.001), with a greater decreased odds in women compared to men (P, for sex interaction <0.001). The difference in the % of CRT-D implant in men vs. women increased over the study period (P, sex Δ time trend = 0.012).CONCLUSION: In this large, contemporary cohort, sex differences in CRT-D implantation were inversely related to predicted CRT efficacy and have increased over time. Future efforts to narrow the gap in CRT-D implantation in men and women may help better align device selection with those most likely to benefit.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Jacobsson, Jonatan, et al.
(författare)
-
Usefulness of the Sum Absolute QRST Integral to Predict Outcomes in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
- 2016
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-9149. ; 118:6, s. 389-395
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and morbidity in selected patients with heart failure (HF), but up to 1/3 of patients are nonresponders. Sum absolute QRST integral (SAI QRST) recently showed association with mechanical response on CRT. However, it is unknown whether SAI QRST is associated with all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations in patients undergoing CRT. The study population included 496 patients undergoing CRT (mean age 69 ± 10 years, 84% men, 65% left bundle branch block [LBBB], left ventricular ejection fraction 23 ± 6%, 63% ischemic cardiomyopathy). Preimplant digital 12-lead electrocardiogram was transformed into orthogonal XYZ electrocardiogram. SAI QRST was measured as an arithmetic sum of areas under the QRST curve on XYZ leads and was dichotomized based on the median value (302 mV ms). All-cause mortality served as the primary end point. A composite of 2-year all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and HF hospitalization was a secondary end point. Cox regression models were adjusted for known predictors of CRT response. Patients with preimplant low mean SAI QRST had an increased risk of both the primary (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.2) and secondary (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.2) end points after multivariate adjustment. SAI QRST was associated with secondary outcome in subgroups of patients with LBBB (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) and with non-LBBB (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.6). In patients undergoing CRT, preimplant SAI QRST
|
|
| 6. |
- Pundi, Krishna, et al.
(författare)
-
Dronedarone Versus Sotalol in Antiarrhythmic Drug-Naive Veterans With Atrial Fibrillation
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. - 1941-3149. ; 16:8, s. 456-467
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Sotalol and dronedarone are both used for maintenance of sinus rhythm for patients with atrial fibrillation. However, while sotalol requires initial monitoring for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia, dronedarone does not. These treatments can be used in comparable patients, but their safety and effectiveness have not been compared head to head. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety using data from a large health care system. METHODS: Using Veterans Health Administration data, we identified 11 296 antiarrhythmic drug-naive patients with atrial fibrillation prescribed dronedarone or sotalol in 2012 or later. We excluded patients with prior conduction disease, pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, ventricular arrhythmia, cancer, renal failure, liver disease, or heart failure. We used natural language processing to identify and compare baseline left ventricular ejection fraction between treatment arms. We used 1:1 propensity score matching, based on patient demographics, comorbidities, and medications, and Cox regression to compare strategies. To evaluate residual confounding, we performed falsification analysis with nonplausible outcomes. RESULTS: The matched cohort comprised 6212 patients (3106 dronedarone and 3106 sotalol; mean [±SD] age, 71±10 years; 2.5% female; mean [±SD] CHA2DS2-VASC, 2±1.3). The mean (±SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 55±11 and 58±10 for dronedarone and sotalol users, correspondingly. Dronedarone, compared with sotalol, did not demonstrate a significant association with risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.21]) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.68-1.16]). However, dronedarone was associated with significantly lower risk of ventricular proarrhythmic events (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38-0.74]) and symptomatic bradycardia (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.37-0.87]). The primary findings were stable across sensitivity analyses. Falsification analyses were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Dronedarone, compared with sotalol, was associated with a lower risk of ventricular proarrhythmic events and conduction disorders while having no difference in risk of incident cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality. These observational data provide the basis for prospective efficacy and safety trials.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Singh, Jagmeet P., et al.
(författare)
-
Dronedarone versus sotalol in patients with atrial fibrillation : A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Clinical Cardiology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0160-9289 .- 1932-8737. ; 46:6, s. 589-597
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThere are limited comparative data on safety and efficacy within commonly used Vaughan-Williams (VW) class III antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) for maintenance of sinus rhythm in adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). HypothesisWe hypothesized that dronedarone and sotalol, two commonly prescribed VW class III AADs with class II properties, have different safety and efficacy effects in patients with nonpermanent AF. MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted searching MEDLINE (R), Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to June 15, 2021 (NCT05279833). Clinical trials and observational studies that evaluated safety and efficacy of dronedarone or sotalol in adults with AF were included. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to quantify comparative safety and efficacy. Where feasible, we performed sensitivity analyses by including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). ResultsOf 3581 records identified through database searches, 37 unique studies (23 RCTs, 13 observational studies, and 1 nonrandomized trial) were included in the NMA. Dronedarone was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of all-cause death versus sotalol (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38 [95% credible interval, CrI: 0.19, 0.74]). The association was numerically similar in the sensitivity analysis (HR = 0.46 [95% CrI: 0.21, 1.02]). AF recurrence and cardiovascular death results were not significantly different between dronedarone and sotalol in all-studies and sensitivity analyses. ConclusionThe NMA findings indicate that, across all clinical trials and observational studies included, dronedarone compared with sotalol was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death, but with no difference in AF recurrence.
|
|
| 9. |
- Singh, Jagmeet P., et al.
(författare)
-
Phased target trial design and meta-analysis in a head-to-head treatment comparison
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1053-8569 .- 1099-1557. ; 32:Suppl. 1, s. 444-444
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: For conditions with rare clinical outcomes, real-world treatment comparisons are challenging to design and prone to confounding.Objectives: To present a robust methodologic approach for rigorous and transparent assessment of rare outcomes using real-world data.Methods: We emulated a target trial using an active comparator, new-user design to compare dronedarone to sotalol for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF) as both are recommended for similar patient phenotypes. Using one protocol, a pre-specified stepwise approach was implemented across 4 datasets (Optum CDM; IBM MarketScan; Veterans Affairs Electronic Health Records; Swedish National Patient Register). Meta-analysis was used to ensure sufficient capture of specific, rare primary outcomes (cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization and ventricular proarrhythmia) and to evaluate consistency of findings across patient populations. Steps 1–3 focused on cohort selection, propensity score matching (PSM), baseline equipoise and residual confounding assessment via negative control outcome analyses. In steps 4–6, outcomes in the individual cohorts were analyzed using an as-treated approach and Cox proportional hazards models. Step 7 included a heterogeneity assessment, meta-analysis using fixed effects models, and hypothesis testing using a hierarchical approach. In step 8, sensitivity analyses, including E-values and Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighting, were conducted to verify the robustness of findings.Results: In step 1, 35,467 sotalol and 27,955 dronedarone patients with AF who were antiarrhythmic drug-naive were identified across databases. In steps 2–3, 23,275 dronedarone patients were PS-matched to 23,275 sotalol patients. Baseline covariates were well-balanced and little-to-no residual confounding was observed via the negative control analyses. Individual HRs were estimated in steps 4–6, and, when no significant heterogeneity between databases was observed, hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled across datasets in step 7. For example, for CV hospitalization, dronedarone was superior to sotalol with no heterogeneity (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.97; Cochran Q p-value: 0.32). Eleven sensitivity analyses were conducted in step 8 and confirmed that findings were generally robust.Conclusions: An active comparator, new-user design using the target trial approach coupled with meta-analysis generated consistent findings across databases and countries using one protocol. Similar methods, including a pre-specified stepwise approach, negative control outcome, and tests for robustness should be considered for real-world studies where specific, rare outcomes need to be examined in a rigorous and transparent way.
|
|
| 10. |
- Végh, Eszter M, et al.
(författare)
-
A new simplified electrocardiographic score predicts clinical outcome in patients treated with CRT
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1532-2092. ; 20:3, s. 492-500
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with heart failure and wide QRS complex, but up to 1/3 of patients are "non-responders" to the therapy. This study examines the ability of a simple standard electrocardiogram (ECG)-based scoring system to predict clinical outcome. Methods and results Four hundred and ninety-one consecutive patients with CRT-implants (79% males, mean age 71 years, LVEF 24%, 59% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 83% in NYHA class III) were included from a single large volume centre. All patients met standard indications for CRT, and were followed for 3 years after CRT implantation. Three ECG parameters were measured on the post-implant ECG, and compared to pre-implantation measurements: QRS duration, time to intrinsicoid deflection onset (ID) in V1 lead, amplitude change in V1 lead. Each positive ECG variable was given a numerical value of 1 to create the score (ranging 0–3). Clinical outcome was assessed as a composite of all-cause death, left ventricular assist device implantation, cardiac transplantation and HF hospitalization. Event-free survival was predicted by shortening of QRS duration ≥20 ms (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48–0.90] P = 0.009), ≥50% decreased summed R + S amplitude in V1 lead (HR 0.67 [0.49–0.90] P = 0.009) and ≤40 msec ID time in lead V1 during pacing (HR 0.63 [0.46–0.86] P = 0.004). The total score was an independent predictor for both event-free survival (HR 0.65 [0.54–0.77] P < 0.001) and for ≥10% left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (OR 1.7 [1.3–2.3] P < 0.001). Conclusions Composite data from 12-lead ECG during CRT-treatment can be used in a simple score to predict long-term clinical outcome.
|
|
