SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-196708"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-196708" > Underreporting cont...

Underreporting contextual factors preclude the applicability appraisal in primary care randomized controlled trials

Missiou, Aristea (författare)
Univ Ioannina, Greece
Ntalaouti, Eleni (författare)
Univ Ioannina, Greece
Lionis, Christos (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för prevention, rehabilitering och nära vård,Medicinska fakulteten,Univ Crete, Greece
visa fler...
Evangelou, Evangelos (författare)
Univ Ioannina, Greece; Imperial Coll London, England
Tatsioni, Athina (författare)
Univ Ioannina, Greece
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2023
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 0895-4356 .- 1878-5921. ; 160, s. 24-32
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objectives: To assess applicability reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in primary care (PC).Study Design and Setting: We used a random sample of PC RCTs published between 2000 and 2020 to assess applicability. We ex-tracted data related to setting, population, intervention (including implementation), comparator, outcomes, and context. Based on data avail-ability, we assessed whether the five predefined applicability questions were adequately addressed by each PC RCT.Results: Adequately described elements that were reported frequently (O50%) included the responsible organization for intervention provision (97, 93.3%), study population characteristics (94, 90.4%), intervention implementation including monitoring and evaluation (92, 88.5%), intervention components (89, 85.6%), time frame (82, 78.8%), baseline prevalence (58, 55.8%), and the type of setting and location (53, 51%). Elements that were often underreported included contextual factors, that is, evidence of differential effects across sociodemo-graphic or other groupings (2, 1.9%), intervention components tailored for specific settings (7, 6.7%), health system structure (32, 30.8%), factors affecting implementation (40, 38.5%) and organization structure (50, 48.1%). The proportion of trials that adequately addressed each applicability question ranged between 1% and 20.2%, while none RCT could address all of them.Conclusion: Underreporting contextual factors jeopardize the appraisal of applicability in PC RCTs. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Applicability; Primary care; Randomized controlled trial; Generalizability; External validity; Implementation

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy