Comparison of sampling methods for 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, (HDI) in a commercial spray box

In this study three different types of samplers for the determination of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate in air were compared. The experimental set up was a simulation of real life conditions with spray painting operations performed inside a commercial, full sized, spray box. The sampling methods were 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine impregnated on glass fibre filter, and the same reagent in impinger, and also dibutylamine in impinger. All analyses were performed by LC-MS-MS. The determined concentrations varied between 20 and 90 microg m(-3) with relative standard deviations from 7 to 17% for each method. No significant difference was found between the three methods using ANOVA with a significance level of alpha = 0.05.

Levin, Jan-OlofNational Institute for Working Life, Umeå(Swepub:umu)jano0008 (författare)
Lindahl, RogerNational Institute for Working Life, Umeå (författare)
Sundgren, MargitNational Institute for Working Life, Umeå (författare)
Ostin, AndersNational Institute for Working Life, Umeå (författare)
National Institute for Working Life, Umeå (creator_code:org_t)

Ingår i:The Analyst: Royal Society of Chemistry127:1, s. 169-1730003-26541364-5528

Av författaren/redakt...: Ekman, Jenny; Levin, Jan-Olof; Lindahl, Roger; Sundgren, Margit; Ostin, Anders

Om ämnet

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.