SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-6084"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-6084" > Påföljdskonkurrens ...

  • Ulväng, MagnusUppsala universitet,Juridiska institutionen (författare)

Påföljdskonkurrens - problem och principer

  • BokSvenska2005

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • Uppsala :Iustus Förlag AB,2005
  • 585 s.
  • printrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-6084
  • ISBN:9176786021
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-6084URI
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-82964URI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:svenska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:vet swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:dok swepub-publicationtype

Serie

  • Skrifter från Juridiska fakulteten i Uppsala,0282-2040 ;99

Anmärkningar

  • Juridikbok.seCC-BY-NC 4.0
  • This is a thesis in criminal law concerning concurrence of crimes and principles of sentencing multiple offenders. Concurrence of crimes occurs in situations where more than one rule (or the same rule several times) can be applied on a certain case. The fact that it is possible to apply the law more than once does not imply that this is also appropriate. When dealing with concurrence of punishment, it is always established that the offender is to be convicted of more than one crime. The main question is what principles should be used in sentencing multiple offenders. Traditionally a number of legislative models and principles have been used, which all are reflections of three principles, namely the principles of cumulation, absorption and asperation. Depending on whether sentencing multiple offending arises on one occasion or on different occasions, distinct types of problems of concurrence occur. The special feature that distinguishes sentencing multiple offenders on different occasions is the time aspect. Under the condition that the previous sentence has not been fully implemented when the new criminality is committed, the court is obliged to—to various extents—take the previous sentence into account when deciding on the new sentence. Thus, the sentencing becomes iterative. The overarching purpose of the thesis is to examine what principles underpin the regulation on sentencing multiple offenders and whether these principles are compatible with the general principles and the ideology of sentencing in Swedish law. A further purpose is to reconstruct the principles applied in iterative sentencing and to examine whether these principles correspond with the general principles of sentencing. My conclusion is that the Criminal Code Ch. 34 rests on partly different rationales and values than the ones governing the Swedish sentencing policy. Hereby, the regulation causes a number of practical problems. The main proposal is that the concurrence doctrine should be based on the same rationales and ideological foundation as the regulation of sentencing in general.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Jareborg, Nils (preses)
  • Asp, Petter (preses)
  • Frände, Dan,ProfessorJuridiska institutionen, Helsingfors (opponent)
  • Uppsala universitetJuridiska institutionen (creator_code:org_t)

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Ulväng, Magnus
Jareborg, Nils
Asp, Petter
Frände, Dan, Pro ...
Om ämnet
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Juridik
och Juridik
Delar i serien
Skrifter från Ju ...
Av lärosätet
Uppsala universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Wikipedia om författaren:
Magnus_Ulväng
Ulväng, Magnus
sv

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy