SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/58947"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/58947" > Evaluating the reli...

  • Bunketorp, Lina,1975Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi,Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy (författare)

Evaluating the reliability of multi-item scales: a non-parametric approach to the ordered categorical structure of data collected with the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Self-Efficacy Scale.

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2005

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • Medical Journals Sweden AB,2005

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/58947
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/58947URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510036411DOI
  • http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:1950852URI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

  • OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of a rank-invariant non-parametric method with that of kappa statistics to evaluate the reliability of the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Self-Efficacy Scale by identifying systematic and random disagreement. The aim was, further, to compare 2 different statistical approaches to obtain a global value from multi-item scales. DESIGN: A test-retest study. SUBJECTS: A total of 46 patients with whiplash-associated disorders were enrolled and 39 (85%) completed the test-retest assessment. METHODS: Data from the multi-item scales were summarized using both sum and median scores. Paired data were evaluated with a rank-invariant statistical method to identify systematic and random disagreement. Data were also evaluated with kappa statistics. RESULTS: The non-parametric approach demonstrated that the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Self-Efficacy Scale are reliable for patients with whiplash-associated disorders. In contrast to the rank-invariant method, kappa statistics provided no information on disagreement between the 2 test occasions. Median scoring improved reliability due to lack of disagreement while the sum scores method was characterized by random individual disagreement. CONCLUSION: This study has increased understanding of the advantages and limitations of 2 non-parametric statistical methods and, it is hoped, will contribute to the development of reliable measurements.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Carlsson, Jane,1946Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi,Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy(Swepub:gu)xcarja (författare)
  • Kowalski, Jan (författare)
  • Stener-Victorin, Elisabet,1964Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi,Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy(Swepub:gu)xsteel (författare)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: Medical Journals Sweden AB37:5, s. 330-41650-1977

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy