Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:5db7c93e-1c57-4cc2-a5d9-6ec87a6df5d6" >
False-positive reca...
-
Johnson, KristinLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital
(författare)
False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2023
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:5db7c93e-1c57-4cc2-a5d9-6ec87a6df5d6
-
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5db7c93e-1c57-4cc2-a5d9-6ec87a6df5d6URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09705-xDOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
Anmärkningar
-
Objectives: To evaluate the total number of false-positive recalls, including radiographic appearances and false-positive biopsies, in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST). Methods: The prospective, population-based MBTST, with 14,848 participating women, was designed to compare one-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to two-view digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. False-positive recall rates, radiographic appearances, and biopsy rates were analyzed. Comparisons were made between DBT, DM, and DBT + DM, both in total and in trial year 1 compared to trial years 2 to 5, with numbers, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The false-positive recall rate was higher with DBT, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4; 1.8), compared to screening with DM, 0.8% (95% CI 0.7; 1.0). The proportion of the radiographic appearance of stellate distortion was 37.3% (91/244) with DBT, compared to 24.0% (29/121) with DM. The false-positive recall rate with DBT during trial year 1 was 2.6% (95% CI 1.8; 3.5), then stabilized at 1.5% (95% CI 1.3; 1.8) during trial years 2 to 5. The percentage of stellate distortion with DBT was 50% (19/38) trial year 1 compared to 35.0% (72/206) trial years 2 to 5. Conclusions: The higher false-positive recall rate with DBT compared to DM was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings. The proportion of these findings, as well as the DBT false-positive recall rate, was reduced after the first trial year. Clinical relevance statement: Assessment of false-positive recalls gives information on potential benefits and side effects in DBT screening. Key Points: • The false-positive recall rate in a prospective digital breast tomosynthesis screening trial was higher compared to digital mammography, but still low compared to other trials. • The higher false-positive recall rate with digital breast tomosynthesis was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings; the proportion of these findings was reduced after the first trial year.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Olinder, JakobLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)ja3675ol
(författare)
-
Rosso, AldanaLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Geriatrik,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,Geriatrics,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)maxl-aro
(författare)
-
Andersson, IngvarLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)ront-ian
(författare)
-
Lång, KristinaLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)med-ksd
(författare)
-
Zackrisson, SophiaLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,LTH profilområde: Avancerade ljuskällor,LTH profilområden,Lunds Tekniska Högskola,LU profilområde: Ljus och material,Lunds universitets profilområden,Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,LTH Profile Area: Photon Science and Technology,LTH Profile areas,Faculty of Engineering, LTH,LU Profile Area: Light and Materials,Lund University Profile areas,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)smi-sza
(författare)
-
Diagnostisk radiologi, MalmöForskargrupper vid Lunds universitet
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:European Radiology33:11, s. 8089-80990938-7994
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas