SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:76ba0f47-c645-4bc5-8755-b45ee8a48e02"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:76ba0f47-c645-4bc5-8755-b45ee8a48e02" > An international mu...

  • Buchwald, PamelaLund University,Lunds universitet,Kirurgi,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Surgery,Lund University Research Groups (creator_code:cre_t)

An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2018

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2018-09-25
  • Wiley,2018

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:76ba0f47-c645-4bc5-8755-b45ee8a48e02
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/76ba0f47-c645-4bc5-8755-b45ee8a48e02URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14376DOI
  • http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:139264350URI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype

Anmärkningar

  • INTRODUCTION: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has rapidly emerged as a novel approach for rectal cancer surgery. Safety profiles are still emerging and more comparative data is urgently needed. This study aimed to compare indications and short-term outcomes of TaTME, open, laparoscopic, and robotic TME internationally.METHODS: A pre-planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 audit was performed. Patients undergoing elective total mesorectal excision (TME) for malignancy between 1 January 2017 and 15 March 2017 by any operative approach were included. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak.RESULTS: Of 2579 included patients, 76.2% (1966/2579) underwent TME with restorative anastomosis of which 19.9% (312/1966) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) which included a transanal component (TaTME). Overall, 9.0% (175/1951, 15 missing outcome data) of patients suffered an anastomotic leak. On univariate analysis both laparoscopic TaTME (OR 1.61, 1.02-2.48, P = 0.04) and robotic TaTME (OR 3.05, 1.10-7.34, P = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak than non-transanal laparoscopic TME. However this association was lost in the mixed-effects model controlling for patient and disease factors (OR 1.23, 0.77-1.97, P = 0.39 and OR 2.11, 0.79-5.62, P = 0.14 respectively), whilst low rectal anastomosis (OR 2.72, 1.55-4.77, P < 0.001) and male gender (OR 2.29, 1.52-3.44, P < 0.001) remained strongly associated. The overall positive circumferential margin resection rate was 4.0%, which varied between operative approaches: laparoscopic 3.2%, transanal 3.8%, open 4.7%, robotic 1%.CONCLUSION: This contemporaneous international snapshot shows that uptake of the TaTME approach is widespread and is associated with surgically and pathologically acceptable results.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Minaya-Bravo, ABAM (författare)
  • Gallo, G (författare)
  • Glasbey, JC (författare)
  • Kamarajah, S (författare)
  • Nepogodiev, D (författare)
  • Pinkney, T (författare)
  • El-Hussana, A (författare)
  • KirurgiForskargrupper vid Lunds universitet (creator_code:org_t)
  • 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Colorectal Disease: Wiley2020 Suppl 6, s. 33-461462-8910
  • Ingår i:Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland: Wiley2020 Suppl 6, s. 33-461463-1318

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy