onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:131233703"
Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:131233703" > Measuring the burde...
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
- Andersen, SB (författare)
Measuring the burden of interval cancers in long-standing screening mammography programmes
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2015
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
- 2015-01-09
- SAGE Publications,2015
Nummerbeteckningar
- LIBRIS-ID:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:131233703
- http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:131233703URI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141314560386DOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
- Språk:engelska
- Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
- SwePubSwePub
Klassifikation
Anmärkningar
- Mammography screening programme sensitivity is evaluated by comparing the interval cancer rate (ICR) with the expected breast cancer incidence without screening, ie. the proportional interval cancer rate (PICR). The PICR is usually found by extrapolating pre-screening incidence rates, whereas ICR is calculated from data available in the screening programmes. As there is no consensus regarding estimation of background incidence, we seek to validate the ICR measure against the PICR. Methods Screening data from the three mammography screening programmes of Stockholm, Copenhagen, and Funen in the period 1989-2011 provided data to calculate the ICR. The most commonly described methods of extrapolating pre-screening incidence rates to calculate the PICR were illustrated and PICRs were calculated by year and programme using these different methods and compared with the ICRs. Results PICRs varied greatly, reaching a difference of 32–34% in Stockholm, 79% in Copenhagen, and 100–106% in Funen between the highest and the lowest value, depending on which method was applied. PICRs exhibited large variations yearly and from programme to programme. ICRs did not vary to the same extent, ranging on average from 0.100 to 0.136 in the first 12-months and between 0.201 and 0.225 in the last 12-months of the two-year period after a negative screen across the three programmes. Conclusion The value of the PICR is hugely influenced by which method is applied, whereas the ICR is calculated purely on data available within programmes. We find that the PICR, the establishing indicator for sensitivity, could preferably be replaced by the ICR.
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
- Tornberg, SKarolinska Institutet (författare)
- Kilpelainen, S (författare)
- Lynge, E (författare)
- Njor, SH (författare)
- Von Euler-Chelpin, M (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet (creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
- Ingår i:Journal of medical screening: SAGE Publications22:2, s. 83-921475-57930969-1413
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
- Journal of medical screening (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)
Till lärosätets databas
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Hitta mer i SwePub
- Av författaren/redakt...
- Andersen, SB
- Tornberg, S
- Kilpelainen, S
- Lynge, E
- Njor, SH
- Von Euler-Chelpi ...
- Artiklar i publikationen
- Journal of medic ...
- Av lärosätet
- Karolinska Institutet
Sök utanför SwePub
- Sök vidare i:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
- Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem
- LIBRIS.kb.se
