SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:4f2aefcc-ed63-415a-aef2-2aee5881f758"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:4f2aefcc-ed63-415a-aef2-2aee5881f758" > A case report of sw...

A case report of switching from specific vendor-based to R-based pipelines for untargeted LC-MS metabolomics

Fernández-Ochoa, Álvaro (författare)
Universidad de Granada
Quirantes-Piné, Rosa (författare)
Borrás-Linares, Isabel (författare)
visa fler...
Cádiz-Gurrea, María de la Luz (författare)
Universidad de Granada
Riquelme, Marta E.Alarcón (författare)
Universidad de Granada
Brunius, Carl, 1974 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Segura-Carretero, Antonio (författare)
Universidad de Granada
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2020-01-08
2020
Engelska.
Ingår i: Metabolites. - : MDPI AG. - 2218-1989 .- 2218-1989. ; 10:1
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Data pre-processing of the LC-MS data is a critical step in untargeted metabolomics studies in order to achieve correct biological interpretations. Several tools have been developed for pre-processing, and these can be classified into either commercial or open source software. This case report aims to compare two specific methodologies, Agilent Profinder vs. R pipeline, for a metabolomic study with a large number of samples. Specifically, 369 plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS. The collected data were pre-processed by both methodologies and later evaluated by several parameters (number of peaks, degree of missingness, quality of the peaks, degree of misalignments, and robustness in multivariate models). The vendor software was characterized by ease of use, friendly interface and good quality of the graphs. The open source methodology could more effectively correct the drifts due to between and within batch effects. In addition, the evaluated statistical methods achieved better classification results with higher parsimony for the open source methodology, indicating higher data quality. Although both methodologies have strengths and weaknesses, the open source methodology seems to be more appropriate for studies with a large number of samples mainly due to its higher capacity and versatility that allows combining different packages, functions, and methods in a single environment.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Programvaruteknik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Software Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Annan teknik -- Mediateknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Other Engineering and Technologies -- Media Engineering (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Bioinformatik och systembiologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Bioinformatics and Systems Biology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Data pre-processing
Mass spectrometry
Metabolomics
R packages
Liquid chromatography
Vendor software

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy