SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:e01ebe5a-6493-4b5f-a3d2-df4f667aae49"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:e01ebe5a-6493-4b5f-a3d2-df4f667aae49" > A clash of clans: a...

A clash of clans: an empirical study of conflicting institutional logics and their impact on megaproject collaboration

af Hällström, Anna, 1987 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology,Göteborgs universitet,University of Gothenburg
 (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
Engelska.
Ingår i: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. - 1753-8386 .- 1753-8378. ; 17:8, s. 47-71
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Purpose: Managing megaprojects is challenging due to their inherent complexity and uncertainty. Collaborative project delivery models have been introduced as an alternative to traditional project management in public infrastructure megaprojects and are often realized through collaborative contracts. These project organizations act as institutional arenas for logic interaction as actors with differing institutional backgrounds interact within the project. This paper aims to study the delivery phase of three megaprojects through an institutional lens, investigating the institutional interaction and alignment of logics therein. Design/methodology/approach: A multiple case study was employed to reach deep insight into the phenomenon. Sixty-one interviews were conducted over 3 cases with representatives from all levels of the project hierarchy. Respondents were selected through snowball sampling. In two cases, observations of the shared project office were conducted. Data analysis built on first-order codes and second-order themes, collected into a theoretical framework. Findings: The empirical evidence demonstrates the dynamics shaping institutional logics and gives evidence for changing logics in projects with a well-applied collaborative contract. However, there is a risk of resistance and a return to traditional logics since institutional change is slow and an unsuitably applied collaborative contract can lead to adherence to the conventional way of work. Originality/value: Current research has focused on the regulatory framework and procurement phase of such models, but little attention has been given to the delivery phase and the interaction of conflicting logics. This paper can serve as an exemplar of the different logics found within public infrastructure projects and their interaction and alignment. Contributions include a heightened emphasis on the start of the project as a meeting point for differing institutional logics and the role change necessary when using a collaborative contract.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap -- Studier av offentlig förvaltning (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science -- Public Administration Studies (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Project delivery methods
Inter-organizational projects
Inter-institutional project
Construction megaprojects
Project management
Construction management
Institutional logics
Megaprojects

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
af Hällström, An ...
Om ämnet
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Annan samhällsve ...
och Tvärvetenskaplig ...
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Statsvetenskap
och Studier av offen ...
Artiklar i publikationen
International Jo ...
Av lärosätet
Chalmers tekniska högskola

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy