| 1. |
- Östgaard, Hans-Christian, 1948, et al.
(författare)
-
Femoral alignment of the Charnley stem: a randomized trial comparing the original with the new instrumentation in 123 hips.
- 2001
-
Ingår i: Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 0001-6470. ; 72:3, s. 228-32
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Deficient cement mantles are associated with aseptic loosening of the stem component of total hip replacement. In a former study of 206 Charnley stems, we found high frequencies of stem malalignment, especially on the lateral view, consequently resulting in a high percentage of low cement mantle grading. If the "true" lateral radiographic projection is not used, there is a risk that the frequency of mantle defects is underestimated. A logistic regression analysis showed a high correlation between low cement mantle grading and stem loosening after a mean follow-up of 10 years. The new Charnley instrumentation was introduced in 1994 and we started a randomized trial including 123 prostheses to determine whether the new instrumentation improved the position of the stem in both the AP and lateral planes. Postoperative radiographs revealed a significant change in AP positioning-i.e., from a high percentage of varus with the original method to valgus with the new instrumentation. However, there was no difference on the lateral view, with a persisting high frequency of stems with implant-inner cortex contact resulting in high percentages of low cement-mantle grading in both systems. If this deficiency, in a long-term perspective, is associated with aseptic loosening, as many authors have claimed, the manufacturers should address the problem.
|
|
| 2. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Acupuncture as an adjunct to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: randomised double-blinded controlled trial comparing acupuncture with non-penetrating sham acupuncture
- 2008
-
Ingår i: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. - : Wiley. - 1471-0528 .- 1470-0328. ; 115:13, s. 1655-68
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether acupuncture has a greater treatment effect than non-penetrating sham acupuncture in women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy. DESIGN: Randomised double-blinded controlled trial. SETTING: East Hospital, Gothenburg, and 25 antenatal primary care units in the region of Västra Götaland, Sweden. POPULATION: A total of 115 pregnant women with a clinical diagnosis of PGP who scored > or =50 on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). METHOD: Women were randomly allocated to standard treatment plus acupuncture or to standard treatment plus non-penetrating sham acupuncture for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measure was pain. Secondary outcomes were frequency of sick leave, functional status, discomfort of PGP, health-related quality of life and recovery of severity of PGP as assessed by the independent examiner. RESULTS: After treatment, median pain decreased from 66 to 36 in the acupuncture group and from 69 to 41 in the non-penetrating sham group (P = 0.493) as assessed on a VAS. Women in the acupuncture group were in regular work to a higher extent than women in the sham group (n = 28/57 versus 16/57, P = 0.041). The acupuncture group had superior ability to perform daily activities measured with the disability rating index (DRI) (44 versus 55, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in quality of life, discomfort of PGP and recovery from severity of PGP between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture had no significant effect on pain or on the degree of sick leave compared with non-penetrating sham acupuncture. There was some improvement in performing daily activities according to DRI. The data imply that needle penetration contributes to a limited extent to the previously reported beneficial effects of acupuncture.
|
|
| 3. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Back pain in relation to pregnancy: A longitudinal 10-year follow-up of 369 women diagnosed with pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Advances in multidisciplinary research for better spinal/pelvic care. The 8th Interdiciplinary World Congress on Low Back & Pelvic Pain, Oct, 2013. Dubai.. - 9789081601603
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction PGP have been associated with muscular dysfunction, maternal factors, and pre-pregnancy low back pain, LBP, and/or pelvic girdle pain, PGP. It has also been stated that the pain and functional disturbances in relation to PGP must be reproducible by specific clinical tests. However, physical examinations have not been performed in long-time follow-ups of women with well-defined PGP during pregnancy and knowledge of potential predictors for long-standing LBP/PGP in these women is limited. Aim To describe the long-term development of back pain in women with well-defined PGP during pregnancy and, to identify potential predictors for persistent PGP and/or LBP in a long time perspective. Materials and Methods Women with well-defined PGP according to mechanical assessment of the, lumbar spine, pelvic pain provocation tests, standard history, pain drawings and European Guidelines who completed one of three treatment studies in 2000-2002, 2006-2007 or 2009-2011 answered a questionnaire. Women reporting pain from the pelvic girdle and/or lower back were physically examined. Results Of 534 eligible women, 380 (71%) answered the questionnaire. Data from 37 (9.7%) women were excluded from analysis due to pregnancy (n=15), systemic disease (n=11), participated in two of the studies (=n5) and declined examination (n=6). Forty-five women/343 (13%) had verified back pain. Of these women, 12/343 (3.5%) had LBP; 15/343 (4.4%) had PGP and 18/343 (5.2%) had combined back- and pelvic girdle pain. During pregnancy, predictors for persisting back pain were: Having a back pain history before pregnancy (p=0.0194), high pain intensity in the morning (Visual Analogue Scale, p=0.0097), impaired function (Oswestery Disability Index p=0.0127), low health related quality of life (Euro-qol, p=0.0097), use of an elastic pelvic belt (p=0.031), difficulty to turn over in bed (p=0.001) and early debut of PGP in pregnancy (p=0.029). Relevance of the number of positive pain provocation tests during pregnancy and at follow-up will also be presented. Relevance PGP can be physically compromising during pregnancy and cause anxiousness concerning childcare after delivery and later return to work and future work planning. It is therefore important to present a reliable prognosis to these women as early as possible, preferably during pregnancy. Discussion Considering the long follow up (10 years), the dropout-ratio in this study was acceptable and the results presented were in line with earlier publications about persistent LBP and PGP in a shorter perspective. Furthermore, the women were physically examined by skilled physiotherapists to confirm the diagnoses PGP and LBP in accordance with the European Guidelines. This increases the reliability of our findings, and we therefore believe that general conclusions can be drawn. A well founded prognosis for the later development of PGP and LBP found during pregnancy thus can be presented to the pregnant women covering the time from delivery up to a decade later. Conclusion: Most women (88%) with well-defined PGP during pregnancy recovered. The long time results confirm earlier short time findings that a back pain history before pregnancy, server PGP during pregnancy and early debut of PGP in pregnancy are risk factors for persisting pain several years postpartum. Implications Identification of women at risk for longstanding back pain seems possible in early pregnancy using physical examination and self-reports.
|
|
| 4. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Bmj. ; 330:7494, s. 761-764
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of standard treatment, standard treatment plus acupuncture, and standard treatment plus stabilising exercises for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy. DESIGN: Randomised single blind controlled trial. Settings East Hospital, Gothenburg, and 27 maternity care centres in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 386 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment for six weeks with standard treatment (n = 130), standard treatment plus acupuncture (n = 125), or standard treatment plus stabilising exercises (n = 131). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was pain (visual analogue scale); secondary outcome measure was assessment of severity of pelvic girdle pain by an independent examiner before and after treatment. RESULTS: After treatment the stabilising exercise group had less pain than the standard group in the morning (median difference = 9, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 12.8; P = 0.0312) and in the evening (13, 2.7 to 17.5; P = 0.0245). The acupuncture group, in turn, had less pain in the evening than the stabilising exercise group (-14, -18.1 to -3.3; P = 0.0130). Furthermore, the acupuncture group had less pain than the standard treatment group in the morning (12, 5.9 to 17.3; P < 0.001) and in the evening (27, 13.3 to 29.5; P < 0.001). Attenuation of pelvic girdle pain as assessed by the independent examiner was greatest in the acupuncture group. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture and stabilising exercises constitute efficient complements to standard treatment for the management of pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy. Acupuncture was superior to stabilising exercises in this study.
|
|
| 5. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial
- 2004
-
Ingår i: The 5th Interdisciplinary World Congress on Low Back Pain & Pelvic Pain”, 2004, Melbourne.. - 9080255149
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of standard treatment, standard treatment plus acupuncture, and standard treatment plus stabilising exercises for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy. DESIGN: Randomised single blind controlled trial. Settings East Hospital, Gothenburg, and 27 maternity care centres in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 386 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment for six weeks with standard treatment (n = 130), standard treatment plus acupuncture (n = 125), or standard treatment plus stabilising exercises (n = 131). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was pain (visual analogue scale); secondary outcome measure was assessment of severity of pelvic girdle pain by an independent examiner before and after treatment. RESULTS: After treatment the stabilising exercise group had less pain than the standard group in the morning (median difference = 9, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 12.8; P = 0.0312) and in the evening (13, 2.7 to 17.5; P = 0.0245). The acupuncture group, in turn, had less pain in the evening than the stabilising exercise group (-14, -18.1 to -3.3; P = 0.0130). Furthermore, the acupuncture group had less pain than the standard treatment group in the morning (12, 5.9 to 17.3; P < 0.001) and in the evening (27, 13.3 to 29.5; P < 0.001). Attenuation of pelvic girdle pain as assessed by the independent examiner was greatest in the acupuncture group. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture and stabilising exercises constitute efficient complements to standard treatment for the management of pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy. Acupuncture was superior to stabilising exercises in this study.
|
|
| 6. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of craniosacral therapy as adjunct to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: A multicentre, single blind, randomised controlled trial
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 0001-6349 .- 1600-0412. ; 92:7, s. 775-782
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective. Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is a disabling condition affecting 30% of pregnant women. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of craniosacral therapy as an adjunct to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone for PGP during pregnancy. Design. Randomised, multicentre, single blind, controlled trial. Setting. University hospital, a private clinic and 26 maternity care centres in Gothenburg, Sweden. Population. 123 pregnant women with PGP. Methods. Participants were randomly assigned to standard treatment (control group, n=60) or standard treatment plus craniosacral therapy (intervention group, n=63). Main Outcome Measures. Primary outcome measures: Pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100mm) and sick leave. Secondary outcomes: function (Oswestery Disability Index), health-related quality of life (Euro-Qol), unpleasantness of pain (VAS), and assessment of the severity of PGP by an independent examiner. Results. Between-group differences for morning pain, symptom-free women and function in the last treatment week were in favor of the intervention group. VAS median was 27 mm (95%CI 24.6-35.9) vs. 35 mm (95%CI 33.5-45.7)(p=0.017) and the function disability index was 40 (range 34-46) vs. 48 (range 40-56)(p=0.016). Conclusions. Lower morning pain intensity and lesser deteriorated function was seen after craniosacral therapy in conjunction with standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone, but no effects regarding evening pain and sick-leave. Treatment effects were small and clinically questionable and conclusions should be drawn carefully. Further studies are warranted before reccomending craniosacral therapy for pelvic girdle pain.
|
|
| 7. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Predictors and consequences of long-term pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: a longitudinal follow-up study.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: BMC musculoskeletal disorders. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2474. ; 17
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is a multifactorial condition, which can be mentally and physically compromising both during and after pregnancy. However, long-term pregnancy-related PGP has been poorly investigated. This longitudinal follow-up study uniquely aimed to describe prevalence and predictors of PGP and its consequences on women's health and function up to 11years after pregnancy.A postal questionnaire was sent to 530 women who participated in 1 of 3 randomized controlled studies for PGP in pregnancy. Women who reported experiencing lumbopelvic pain were offered a clinical examination. Main outcome measure was the presence of long term PGP as assessed by an independent examiner. Secondary outcomes were: working hours/week, function (the Disability Rating Index, and Oswestry Disability Index), self-efficacy (the General Self-Efficacy Scale), HRQL (Euro-Qol 5D and EQ-Visual scale), anxiety and depression, (Hospital anxiety and depression scale,) and pain-catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), in women with PGP compared to women with no PGP.A total of 371/530 (70%) women responded and 37/ 371 (10%) were classified with long-term PGP. Pregnancy-related predictors for long-term PGP were number of positive pain provocation tests (OR=1.79), history of low back pain (LBP) (OR=2.28), positive symphysis pressure test (OR=2.01), positive Faber (Patrick's) test (OR=2.22), and positive modified Trendelenburg test (OR=2.20). Women with PGP had significantly decreased ability to perform daily activities (p<.001), lower self-efficacy (p=0.046), decreased HRQL (p<.001), higher levels of anxiety and depression (p<.001), were more prone to pain catastrophizing, and worked significantly fewer hours/week (p=0.032) compared to women with no PGP.This unique long-term follow up of PGP highlights the importance of assessment of pain in the lumbopelvic area early in pregnancy and postpartum in order to identify women with risk of long term pain. One of 10 women with PGP in pregnancy has severe consequences up to 11years later. They could be identified by number of positive pain provocation tests and experience of previous LBP. Access to evidence based treatments are important for individual and socioeconomic reasons.
|
|
| 8. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Regression of pelvic girdle pain after delivery: follow-up of a randomised single blind controlled trial with different treatment modalities
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 1600-0412 .- 0001-6349. ; 87:2, s. 201-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: An earlier publication showed that acupuncture and stabilising exercises as an adjunct to standard treatment was effective for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy, but the post-pregnancy effects of these treatment modalities are unknown. The aim of this follow-up study was to describe regression of pelvic girdle pain after delivery in these women. DESIGN: A randomised, single blind, controlled trial. SETTING: East Hospital and 27 maternity care centres in Göteborg, Sweden. POPULATION: Some 386 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to standard treatment plus acupuncture (n=125), standard treatment plus specific stabilising exercises (n=131) or to standard treatment alone (n=130). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures: pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary outcome measure: assessment of the severity of pelvic girdle pain by an independent examiner 12 weeks after delivery. RESULTS: Approximately three-quarters of all the women were free of pain 3 weeks after delivery. There were no differences in recovery between the 3 treatment groups. According to the detailed physical examination, pelvic girdle pain had resolved in 99% of the women 12 weeks after delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that irrespective of treatment modality, regression of pelvic girdle pain occurs in the great majority of women within 12 weeks after delivery.
|
|
| 9. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Regression of pelvic girdle pain after delivery: follow-up of a randomised single blind controlled trial with different treatment modalities
- 2007
-
Ingår i: The 6th Interdiciplinary World Congress on Low Back Pain & Pelvic Pain, 2007 Barcelona.. - 9080255114
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: An earlier publication showed that acupuncture and stabilising exercises as an adjunct to standard treatment was effective for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy, but the post-pregnancy effects of these treatment modalities are unknown. The aim of this follow-up study was to describe regression of pelvic girdle pain after delivery in these women. DESIGN: A randomised, single blind, controlled trial. SETTING: East Hospital and 27 maternity care centres in Göteborg, Sweden. POPULATION: Some 386 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to standard treatment plus acupuncture (n=125), standard treatment plus specific stabilising exercises (n=131) or to standard treatment alone (n=130). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures: pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary outcome measure: assessment of the severity of pelvic girdle pain by an independent examiner 12 weeks after delivery. RESULTS: Approximately three-quarters of all the women were free of pain 3 weeks after delivery. There were no differences in recovery between the 3 treatment groups. According to the detailed physical examination, pelvic girdle pain had resolved in 99% of the women 12 weeks after delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that irrespective of treatment modality, regression of pelvic girdle pain occurs in the great majority of women within 12 weeks after delivery.
|
|
| 10. |
- Elden, Helen, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment Modalities for Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnant Women
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies. - : Medical Association of Pharmacopuncture Institute. - 2005-2901.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Abstract Background: Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) affects 30 percent of pregnant women. It severely affects pregnant women’s daily lives and causes high costs for society. Methods: Two randomized controlled trials (RCT) compared the efficacies of (1) standard treatment (S) plus acupuncture (ACU), S þ stabilizing exercises (SE), and S alone (nZ386) and (2) penetrating acupuncture (PACU) and non-penetrating sham acupuncture (NPACU) as an adjunct to S in pregnant women (nZ115) with well-defined PGP. Results: ACU, as well as SE, constituted efficient complements to S for PGP during pregnancy. ACU had no observable severe adverse influences on the pregnancy, the mother, the delivery or the fetus/neonate. Regression of PGP after delivery was excellent. Both PACU and NPACU led to clinically relevant decreases in pain. Compared to the NPACU group, the PACU group had superior ability in 7 of 13 daily activities. Conclusion: ACU and SE as adjuncts to standard treatment are effective for treating PGP during pregnancy. Acupuncture is not accompanied by any severe adverse influences on the pregnant women or the fetus/neonate. Regression of PGP occurs in the great majority of women after delivery. PACU had no additional effect on PGP reduction compared to NPACU, but it improved the ability to perform daily activities, keeping more women in regular work. Keywords: pelvic girdle pain; acupuncture; stabilizing exercises; adverse events; regression
|
|
