| 1. |
- Bergerot, Cristiane Decat, et al.
(författare)
-
Frustration and distress during treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil. KCCure, Alexandria, VA USA. City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Monrovia, CA USA. Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA. Johns Hopkins Univ, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA. Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA. Umea Univ, Umea, Sweden. Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands. City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA USA. Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp Munich Grosshadern, Munich, Germany. City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Duarte, CA USA. : AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 36:34
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergerot, Cristiane Decat, et al.
(författare)
-
Sources of Frustration Among Patients Diagnosed With Renal Cell Carcinoma
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Oncology. - : Frontiers Media S.A.. - 2234-943X. ; 9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Despite numerous therapeutic advances in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), little is known about patients' perspectives on cancer care. An international survey was conducted to identify points of frustration associated with cancer care reported by patients with RCC. Data were obtained from an online survey, conducted from April 1 to June 15, 2017, through social media and patient networking platforms. This survey obtained baseline demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment-related information. Open-ended questions accessed sources of frustration in cancer-related care and patients' suggestions for amelioration. Responses were categorized and reviewed by independent reviewers. A qualitative analysis was performed and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to define associations between baseline characteristics and sources of frustration. Among 450 patients surveyed, 71.5% reported sources of frustration, classified as either emotional (48.4%) or practical (23.1%). The most common were fear of recurrence/progression (15.8%), distrust of their cancer care system (12.9%), and lack of appropriate information (9.8%). Female gender and non-clear cell histology were associated with both types of frustration, and older age was linked to practical sources of frustration. Patients suggested solutions included greater compassion among health care practitioners (20.7%), better access to information (15.1%) and research to improve their chances of being cured (14.7%). Sources of frustration related to emotional and practical causes were identified amongst patients with RCC. Certain demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with more sources of frustration. This study provides the first characterization of specific ways to improve the patient experience by addressing common frustrations.
|
|
| 3. |
- Patel, Shruti R., et al.
(författare)
-
Race/Ethnicity and Gender Representation in Hematology and Oncology Editorial Boards : What is the State of Diversity?
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Oncologist. - 1083-7159. ; 28:7, s. 609-617
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Women and underrepresented groups in medicine hold few academic leadership positions in the field of hematology/oncology. In this study, we assessed gender and race/ethnicity representation in editorial board positions in hematology/oncology journals. Materials and Methods: Editorial leadership board members from 60 major journals in hematology and oncology were reviewed; 54 journals were included in the final analysis. Gender and race/ethnicity were determined based on publicly available data for Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and Second-in-Command (SiC) (including deputy, senior, or associate editors). Descriptive statistics and chi-squared were estimated. In the second phase of the study, editors were emailed a 4-item survey to self-identify their demographics. Results: Out of 793 editorial board members, 72.6% were men and 27.4% were women. Editorial leadership were non-Hispanic white (71.1%) with Asian editorial board members representing the second largest majority at 22.5%. Women comprised only 15.9% of the EiC positions (90% White and 10% Asian). Women were about half as likely to be in the EiC position compared with men [pOR 0.47 (95% CI, 0.23-0.95, P =. 03)]. Women represented 28.3% of SiC editorial positions. Surgical oncology had the lowest female representation at 2.3%. Conclusion: Women and minorities are significantly underrepresented in leadership roles on Editorial Boards in hematology/oncology journals. Importantly, the representation of minority women physicians in EiC positions is at an inexorable zero.
|
|
