| 1. |
- Brunkwall, J., et al.
(författare)
-
Endovascular Repair of Acute Uncomplicated Aortic Type B Dissection Promotes Aortic Remodelling: 1 Year Results of the ADSORB Trial
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-2165 .- 1078-5884. ; 48:3, s. 285-291
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (AD) treated conservatively has a 10% 30-day mortality and up to 25% need intervention within 4 years. In complicated AD, stent grafts have been encouraging. The aim of the present prospective randomised trial was to compare best medical treatment (BMT) with BMT and Gore TAG stent graft in patients with uncomplicated AD. The primary endpoint was a combination of incomplete/no false lumen thrombosis, aortic dilatation, or aortic rupture at 1 year. Methods: The AD history had to be less than 14 days, and exclusion criteria were rupture, impending rupture, malperfusion. Of the 61 patients randomised, 80% were DeBakey type IIIB. Results: Thirty-one patients were randomised to the BMT group and 30 to the BMT+TAG group. Mean age was 63 years for both groups. The left subclavian artery was completely covered in 47% and in part in 17% of the cases. During the first 30 days, no deaths occurred in either group, but there were three crossovers from the BMT to the BMT TAG group, all due to progression of disease within 1 week. There were two withdrawals from the BMT+TAG group. At the 1-year follow up there had been another two failures in the BMT group: one malperfusion and one aneurysm formation (p = .056 for all). One death occurred in the BMT TAG group. For the overall endpoint BMT+TAG was significantly different from BMT only (p < .001). Incomplete false lumen thrombosis, was found in 13 (43%) of the TAG+BMT group and 30 (97%) of the BMT group (p < .001). The false lumen reduced in size in the BMT+TAG group (p < .001) whereas in the BMT group it increased. The true lumen increased in the BMT TAG (p < .001) whereas in the BMT group it remained unchanged. The overall transverse diameter was the same at the beginning and after 1 year in the BMT group (42.1 mm), but in the BMT+TAG it decreased (38.8 mm; p = .062). Conclusions: Uncomplicated AD can be safely treated with the Gore TAG device. Remodelling with thrombosis of the false lumen and reduction of its diameter is induced by the stent graft, but long term results are needed. (C) 2014 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Erhart, P., et al.
(författare)
-
Finite Element Analysis in Asymptomatic, Symptomatic, and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms : In Search of New Rupture Risk Predictors
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 49:3, s. 239-245
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To compare biomechanical rupture risk parameters of asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using finite element analysis (FEA). Study design: Retrospective biomechanical single center analysis of asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured AAAs. Comparison of biomechanical parameters from FEA. Materials and methods: From 2011 to 2013 computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from 30 asymptomatic, 15 symptomatic, and 15 ruptured AAAs were collected consecutively. FEA was performed according to the successive steps of AAA vessel reconstruction, segmentation and finite element computation. Biomechanical parameters Peak Wall Rupture Risk Index (PWRI), Peak Wall Stress (PWS), and Rupture Risk Equivalent Diameter (RRED) were compared among the three subgroups. Results: PWRI differentiated between asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs (p < .0004) better than PWS (p < .1453). PWRI-dependent RRED was higher in the symptomatic subgroup compared with the asymptomatic subgroup (p < .0004). Maximum AAA external diameters were comparable between the two groups (p < .1355). Ruptured AAAs showed the highest values for external diameter, total intraluminal thrombus volume, PWS, RRED, and PWRI compared with asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs. In contrast with symptomatic and ruptured AAAs, none of the asymptomatic patients had a PWRI value >1.0. This threshold value might identify patients at imminent risk of rupture: Conclusions: From different FEA derived parameter, PWRI distinguishes most precisely between asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs. If elevated, this value may represent a negative prognostic factor for asymptomatic AAAs.
|
|
| 3. |
- Hyhlik-Dürr, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Finite Element Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms : Preliminary Results of Intra and Inter observer Validation
- 2010
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is indicated if risk for rupture exceeds the risk for aortic repair. Estimation of the individual risk for rupture in AAA is therefore essential. The diameter of AAA is known as an independent risk factor for rupture and therefore the base of indication for surgical or endovascular therapy. For more sensitive patient selection, other morphological or hemodynamic predictors such as volume or peak wall stress have to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of diameter measurement, volume estimation and peak wall stress calculation in AAA by finite element analysis. Methods: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of 10 patients with AAA and 4 volunteers with healthy infrarenal aortas were analyzed by three independent investigators. A semiautomatic reconstruction using two- and three-dimensional deformable (active) contour models was used to segment vascular bodies from CTA data. Centreline calculated maximal diameter and volume measurements, as extracted from the reconstructed abdominal aorta, as well as peak wall stress, as predicted by three-dimensional non-linear finite element models, were analyzed. Specifically, aortic wall and thrombus tissue were captured by isotropic, non-linear and finite strain constitutive models. Likewise, mean arterial pressure was applied at the luminal surface, the vessels were fixed at the renal arteries and the aortic bifurcation and no contact with surrounding organs was considered. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities for diameter, volume and peak wall stress measurements were assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV=SD*100/mean in %) of the five fold determinations. The methodological variation was expressed as deviation of diameter (mm), volume (ml) and peak wall stress (kPa) amongst the three observers. Results: Reproducibility measurements in healthy vessels of aortic diameters between 16.1mm to 16.6mm varied from CV=2.5% to CV=4.9%. Abdominal aortic volumes of 14ml to 15ml were measured in the healthy cohort with a reproducibility of CV=5.8% to CV=11.5%. Peak wall stress varied between 53 kPa and 55 kPa, where CV ranged from 3-13%. Inter-observer variation was <10% for diameter, volume and peak stress in healthy volunteers. Aortic diameter in three AAAs was measured to 58.9 mm; 54.6 mm; and 71.2 mm respectively. The coefficient of variation showed high agreement with values less than 5%. AAA volume varied between 130 ml and 300 ml (CV < 10%) and Peak wall stress was predicted between 172 kPa and 296 kPa (CV <10%). Variability between the 3 observers in AAA measurements was 0.7 mm – 6.0 mm for diameter, 11 – 28 ml for volume and 4-27 kPa for peak wall stress, respectively. Conclusions: Volume and diameter measurements based on geometrical models reconstructed from CTA scans showed quit good reproducibility for serial measurements in normal and degenerative arteries. Peak wall stress predictions exhibited high accordance between different observers, and in serial measurements within one observer. Volume and peak wall stress analysis could be an additionally module for assessment of individual rupture risk in AAA in the future, which however needs to be validated by additional studies.
|
|
