| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Petäjä, Ulf, 1967-
(author)
-
Därför är yttrandefriheten värdefull
- 2006
-
In: Tvärsnitt. - Stockholm : Vetenskapsrådet. - 0348-7997. ; :3, s. 2-5
-
Journal article (pop. science, debate, etc.)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Petäjä, Ulf, 1967-
(author)
-
Internet och två demokratiska problem
- 2015. - 1:1
-
In: Vinklade budskap – perspektiv på politisk kommunikation. - Halmstad : Halmstad University Press. - 9789187045233 - 9789187045226 ; , s. 105-113
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 6. |
- Petäjä, Ulf, 1967-
(author)
-
J.S. Mill och bestraffningar av "self-regarding acts"
- 2006
-
In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift. - Lund : Fahlbeckska Stiftelsen. - 0039-0747. ; 108:3, s. 235-247
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- J. S. Mill and punishment of 'self-regarding acts'. In his famous essay On LJberty,]ohn Stuart Mill divides individual acts in two categories; acts that only harm the acting individual himself, and acts that harms other individuals. The former is called 'self-regarding acts' and the latter is called 'other-regarding acts'. There has been a long debate between famous scholars about how to interpret Mill at this point. Some argue that Mill permit that (i) only other-regarding acts could be punished, and other argue that Mill support that (ii) even self-regarding acts could be punished. I argue that Mill could not hold both of the positions at the same time, and if he does he must be guilty of a severe inconsistency. The analysis shows that interpretation (ii) is most reasonable. One conclusion that follows is that Mills liberalism is not ";radically individualistic";, it is instead a perfectionistic form of political liberalism, including both radical and communitarian ideas.
|
|
| 7. |
- Petäjä, Ulf, 1967-
(author)
-
Rätt till rättshjälp? Rättssäkerhet, fundamentala nyttigheter och rättshjälpsreformen 1997
- 2023
-
In: Retfærd. - Copenhagen : Djoef Forlag. - 0105-1121. ; :3, s. 55-67
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The article treats the law concerning legal aid adopted 1973 and its 1997 reform. It evaluates them based on Ronald Dworkin’s distinction between fundamental- and secondary utilities and two of Åke Frändberg’s legal security categories – equality before the law and access to justice. The analysis shows that while the 1997 legislation is founded on economic efficiency, the law from 1973 hinges on legal security for all. The result finds that the reform view legal aid as a secondary utility, while the law from 1973 express it as a fundamental utility. Thus, the view of legal aid changed: what was seen as a right, like the right to vote, is perceived in 1997 as the state’s ‘gift’. According to Frändberg’s categories we can conclude that the reform represents a weakening of access to justice and equality before the law. This implies discrimination against certain groups who, due to insufficient resources, will encounter difficulties in asserting their rights.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
