| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Gärdenfors, Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
Pantomime als Grundlage für Ritual und Sprache
- 2018
-
Ingår i: "Ein Symbol dessen, was wir sind" : Liturgische Perspektiven zur Frage der Sakramentalität - Liturgische Perspektiven zur Frage der Sakramentalität. - 9783791725857 ; 48:1-2, s. 23-40
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Portin, Fredrik, 1980
(författare)
-
Liturgies in a plural age: The concept of liturgy in the works of William T. Cavanaugh and James K. A. Smith
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Studia Liturgica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0039-3207 .- 2517-4797. ; 49:1, s. 122-137
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the article the political theologians William T. Cavanaugh's and James K. A. Smith's understanding of liturgy is analyzed and compared. In an effort to engage with public life from the perspective of theology, they both develop an understanding of liturgy that does not restrict it to a practice within a Christian context Instead, they argue that liturgies are practices that also are observable within secular contexts. From this analysis, two understandings of liturgy are highlighted: liturgy as resistance and liturgy as dialogue. In conclusion, the article discusses what implications these understandings of liturgy have for the Church when confronting a contemporary pluralistic public context. © The Author(s) 20l9.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Rosenius, Marie, 1969-
(författare)
-
The liturgical movement in context of secularization : late modern developments
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Studia liturgica. - : Sage Publications. - 0039-3207. ; 54:1, s. 129-142
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The article highlights secular influences in contemporary understandings of liturgical participation by exploring the relationship between visions of the early modern liturgical movement and contemporary ways of understanding participation in the Church of Sweden. The constructs opine, understand, and do are used in the comparison as are the concepts participatio plena, participatio conscia, and participatio actuosa in Sacrosanctum Concilium. An overall reflection based on the analysis is that secular ideologies and trends not only influence liturgical form but tend to erode theological language itself. Religious individualism, combined with “internal ecclesial secularization,” tends to imbue the very understanding of church and of liturgy. A new phase in the liturgical movement called the “late modern liturgical movement” is discussed. The church appears here as the “church of the individual” and the liturgy in the sense of ordo is seen as an “open” order and framework, rather than as juxtaposition and sacramental event.
|
|
