SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-139640"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-139640" > Biomarker Profiles ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Biomarker Profiles in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Tromp, Jasper (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands
Khan, Mohsin A. F. (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Centre, Netherlands
Klip, IJsbrand T. (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands
show more...
Meyer, Sven (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands; Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany
de Boer, Rudolf A. (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands
Jaarsma, Tiny (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för omvårdnad,Medicinska fakulteten
Hillege, Hans (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J. (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands
van der Meer, Peter (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands
Voors, Adriaan A. (author)
University of Groningen, Netherlands
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
WILEY, 2017
2017
English.
In: Journal of the American Heart Association. - : WILEY. - 2047-9980. ; 6:4
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background-Biomarkers may help us to unravel differences in the underlying pathophysiology between heart failure (HF) patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Therefore, we compared biomarker profiles to characterize pathophysiological differences between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF. Methods and Results-We retrospectively analyzed 33 biomarkers from different pathophysiological domains (inflammation, oxidative stress, remodeling, cardiac stretch, angiogenesis, arteriosclerosis, and renal function) in 460 HF patients (21% HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction amp;gt;= 45%) measured at discharge after hospitalization for acute HF. The association between these markers and the occurrence of all-cause mortality and/or HF-related rehospitalizations at 18 months was compared between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF. Patients were 70.6 +/- 11.4 years old and 37.4% were female. Patients with HFpEF were older, more often female, and had a higher systolic blood pressure. Levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein were significantly higher in HFpEF, while levels of pro-atrial-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide were higher in HFrEF. Linear regression followed by network analyses revealed prominent inflammation and angiogenesis-associated interactions in HFpEF and mainly cardiac stretch-associated interactions in HrEF. The angiogenesis-specific marker, neuropilin and the remodeling-specific marker, osteopontin were predictive for all-cause mortality and/or HF-related rehospitalizations at 18 months in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF (P for interaction amp;lt;0.05). Conclusions-In HFpEF, inflammation and angiogenesis- mediated interactions are predominantly observed, while stretch-mediated interactions are found in HFrEF. The remodeling marker osteopontin and the angiogenesis marker neuropilin predicted outcome in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kardiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

biomarker; heart failure; multimarker; pathophysiology

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view