Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-452121" >
Body size and compo...
Body size and composition and risk of site-specific cancers in the UK Biobank and large international consortia : A mendelian randomisation study
-
- Vithayathil, Mathew (author)
- Univ Cambridge, MRC Canc Unit, Cambridge, England.
-
- Carter, Paul (author)
- Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England.
-
- Kar, Siddhartha (author)
- Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England.;Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, MRC Integrat Epidemiol Unit, Bristol, Avon, England.
-
show more...
-
- Mason, Amy M. (author)
- Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England.
-
- Burgess, Stephen (author)
- Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England.;Univ Cambridge, MRC Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England.
-
- Larsson, Susanna C. (author)
- Karolinska Institutet,Uppsala universitet,Medicinsk epidemiologi,Karolinska Inst, Unit Cardiovasc & Nutr Epidemiol, Inst Environm Med, Stockholm, Sweden.
-
show less...
-
Univ Cambridge, MRC Canc Unit, Cambridge, England Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England. (creator_code:org_t)
- 2021-07-29
- 2021
- English.
-
In: PLoS Medicine. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1549-1277 .- 1549-1676. ; 18:7
- Related links:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show more...
-
https://uu.diva-port... (primary) (Raw object)
-
https://journals.plo...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
http://kipublication...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Author summary Why was this study done? The causal relevance of body size and composition as risk factors for specific cancers is unclear based on traditional observational studies. By considering the relationships between genetically predicted values of body size and composition with cancer risk, our estimates are less influenced by confounding variables, and, hence, more reliably reflect the underlying causal relationships between these measures and cancer risk. What did the researchers do and find? We assessed the associations between genetically predicted body mass index (BMI), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index (FFMI), and height with 22 specific cancers in the UK Biobank (UKBB), a population-based sample of the United Kingdom residents. Although genetically predicted height was consistently associated with increased risk of site-specific cancers, genetically predicted BMI was associated with an increased risk of certain digestive system cancers (esophageal, stomach, liver, and pancreas), plus lung and uterine cancer, but a decreased risk of breast and prostate cancer. When dividing cancers into digestive system cancers versus non-digestive system cancers, genetically predicted BMI was associated with increased risk of digestive system cancers, but not associated with non-digestive system cancers. What do these findings mean? Our findings suggest that BMI is a causal risk factor for some cancers, but is not a generic risk factor for all cancers. Body fat may play a role in development of specific cancers and should be studied further to identify future targets to prevent cancer. Public health strategies should focus on reducing obesity as a risk factor for cancer, but should be clear that benefit may be limited to certain cancers. Background Evidence for the impact of body size and composition on cancer risk is limited. This mendelian randomisation (MR) study investigates evidence supporting causal relationships of body mass index (BMI), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index (FFMI), and height with cancer risk. Methods and findings Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used as instrumental variables for BMI (312 SNPs), FMI (577 SNPs), FFMI (577 SNPs), and height (293 SNPs). Associations of the genetic variants with 22 site-specific cancers and overall cancer were estimated in 367,561 individuals from the UK Biobank (UKBB) and with lung, breast, ovarian, uterine, and prostate cancer in large international consortia. In the UKBB, genetically predicted BMI was positively associated with overall cancer (odds ratio [OR] per 1 kg/m(2) increase 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.02; p = 0.043); several digestive system cancers: stomach (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.21; p < 0.001), esophagus (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03, 1.17; p = 0.003), liver (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25; p = 0.012), and pancreas (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12; p = 0.016); and lung cancer (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12; p < 0.001). For sex-specific cancers, genetically predicted elevated BMI was associated with an increased risk of uterine cancer (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15; p < 0.001) and with a lower risk of prostate cancer (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99; p = 0.009). When dividing cancers into digestive system versus non-digestive system, genetically predicted BMI was positively associated with digestive system cancers (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06; p < 0.001) but not with non-digestive system cancers (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.02; p = 0.369). Genetically predicted FMI was positively associated with liver, pancreatic, and lung cancer and inversely associated with melanoma and prostate cancer. Genetically predicted FFMI was positively associated with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and melanoma. Genetically predicted height was associated with increased risk of overall cancer (OR per 1 standard deviation increase 1.09; 95% CI 1.05-1.12; p < 0.001) and multiple site-specific cancers. Similar results were observed in analyses using the weighted median and MR-Egger methods. Results based on consortium data confirmed the positive associations between BMI and lung and uterine cancer risk as well as the inverse association between BMI and prostate cancer, and, additionally, showed an inverse association between genetically predicted BMI and breast cancer. The main limitations are the assumption that genetic associations with cancer outcomes are mediated via the proposed risk factors and that estimates for some lower frequency cancer types are subject to low precision. Conclusions Our results show that the evidence for BMI as a causal risk factor for cancer is mixed. We find that BMI has a consistent causal role in increasing risk of digestive system cancers and a role for sex-specific cancers with inconsistent directions of effect. In contrast, increased height appears to have a consistent risk-increasing effect on overall and site-specific cancers.
Subject headings
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database