SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/50622"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/50622" > Practising Peer Rev...

Practising Peer Review in Organizations: a Qualifier for Knowledge Dissemination and Legitimization

Bergquist, Magnus, 1960 (författare)
RISE,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad informationsteknologi (GU),Department of Applied Information Technology (GU),Viktoria,Knowledge Management Group, Viktoria Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden
Ljungberg, Jan, 1956 (författare)
RISE,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad informationsteknologi (GU),Department of Applied Information Technology (GU),Viktoria,Knowledge Management Group, Viktoria Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden
Lundh Snis, Ulrika, 1970- (författare)
Högskolan Väst,Institutionen för informatik och matematik (HTU),Laboratorium for Interaction Technology, Trollhättan Uddevalla University, Uddevalla, Sweden
 (creator_code:org_t)
London : SAGE Publications, 2001
2001
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Information Technology. - London : SAGE Publications. ; 16:2, s. 99-112
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • A key issue in many organizations is how to disseminate information in an effective way and, more importantly, how to make use of this information in order to create new knowledge. One way of addressing this problem is to focus on how information is socially transformed into knowledge. This includes how knowledge is handled in practice and how the knowledge produced is quali ed as being something worth knowing and acting upon. Two well-established practices for doing this are the refereeing system and the peer review process. These are used in scienti c communities as a means of validating and legitimating knowledge, for example by reviewing journal papers before publishing or project proposals before granting funds, etc. This paper argues that peer review is a useful concept when looking at knowledge creation and legitimization in organizations. The social meaning of peer review is to legitimize new knowledge by organizationally sanctioning it and thereby creating a platform for collective sense making. This paper uses an example from a eld study in a pharmaceutical company in order to illustrate this argument. The study took place in a quality support department where the quality of health care products and processes was assessed. The organization had a need for fast and reliable updating of information that could in uence how the production process of pharmaceuticals should be carried out. In order to cope with these problems the department established an ‘evaluation loop’, which shared several characteristics with the peer review process.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap -- Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik med samhällsvetenskaplig inriktning (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Media and Communications -- Information Systems, Social aspects (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Knowledge Management
Peer Review
Knowledge Creation
Pharmaceuptical Industry
Informatik

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy