SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Winkler Stefan)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Winkler Stefan) > Distinguishing tran...

Distinguishing transdisciplinary (and) action research in sustainability science : a comparative systematic-narrative hybrid literature review

Laycock Pedersen, Rebecca (författare)
University of Calgary
Nikulina, Varvara (författare)
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola,Institutionen för strategisk hållbar utveckling
Chineme, Tinuke (författare)
visa fler...
Subroto, Sujoy (författare)
Robinson, Zoe (författare)
Winkler, Klara (författare)
Luederitz, Christopher (författare)
Metson, Genevieve (författare)
Malmborg, Katja (författare)
Moriggi, Angela (författare)
Lam, David P. M. (författare)
Partelow, Stefan (författare)
Cockburn, Jessica (författare)
Bhurekeni, John (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Engelska.
  • Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • There are many socially engaged research modes in sustainability science. The main ones are action research and transdisciplinary research. There is also transdisciplinary action research, a field that seems to combine the two. This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the differences between these research modes in the context of sustainability science to help potential users to determine appropriate research mode(s) to fulfil their purposes. To do so, we asked three research questions: (i) What are the aims of these research modes? (ii) What are some methods used to fulfil the aims of these research modes? (iii) In what empirical domain are the different approaches being used today? Using a comparative systematic-narrative hybrid literature review and bibliometric studies the paper attempts to fulfil the set aim. In total, we analysed 1487 articles in-depth, of which 633 utilised the action research mode, 787 used transdisciplinary research, and 67 used transdisciplinary action research. There are a lot of similarities between the research modes, e.g. they all use traditional qualitative social science research methods, engage the same types of stakeholders, and address the same sustainability issues. But the differences relate to the aims of the research modes. Researchers employing action research seem to be more intent on achieving action in the practice domain and knowledge from that action for both practitioners and researchers (action-for-knowledge). In contrast, researchers employing transdisciplinary research rather seem to be more intent on producing new, relevant and shared knowledge for an action that is later undertaken in the practice domain (knowledge-for-action). Although this might be a premature conclusion, researchers employing transdisciplinary action research seem to be more intent on achieving action based on integrative knowledge (integrative knowledge-for-action). Finally, some advice regarding the choice of research mode for a particular purpose is presented.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

action research
transdisciplinarity
transdisciplinary action research
comparative study
systematic-narrative hybrid literature review
method
narrative
bibliometric study

Publikations- och innehållstyp

vet (ämneskategori)
ovr (ämneskategori)

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy