Sökning: WFRF:(Gustavsson Eva) >
Swedish Translation...
Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)
-
- Nilsson Kajermo, Kerstin (författare)
- Karolinska University Hospital
-
- Böe, Heidi (författare)
- Karolinska University Hospital
-
- Johansson, Eva (författare)
- Röda Korsets Högskola,Karolinska Institutet,Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital
-
visa fler...
-
- Henriksen, Eva (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet
-
- McCormack, Brendan (författare)
- Buskerud University College, Drammen, Norway / University of Technology, Sydney, Australia / Monash University, Melbourne, Australia / University of Aberdeen, Scotland
-
- Gustavsson, J Petter (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet
-
- Wallin, Lars (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet,Karolinska Institutet / Karolinska University Hospital
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2012-05-30
- 2013
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 1545-102X .- 1741-6787. ; 10:1, s. 41-50
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa fler...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
http://kipublication...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- BACKGROUND: The strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context-The Context Assessment Index (CAI)-was developed and published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties. METHODS: The instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency. RESULT: Sixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale. DISCUSSION: The Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Instrument translation; validation; evidence use; nursing; PARIHS framework; psychometric evaluation; context
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas