SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Fritzell Kaisa)
 

Search: WFRF:(Fritzell Kaisa) > The importance of p...

The importance of people's values and preferences for colorectal cancer screening participation

Fritzell, Kaisa (author)
Karolinska Institutet,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Stake Nilsson, Kerstin (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,Medicin- och vårdvetenskap
Jervaeus, Anna (author)
Karolinska Institutet,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
show more...
Hultcrantz, Rolf (author)
Karolinska Institutet,Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Wengström, Yvonne (author)
Karolinska Institutet,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Breast and Sarcoma Unit, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Swede
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017-02-04
2017
English.
In: European Journal of Public Health. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1101-1262 .- 1464-360X. ; 27:6, s. 1079-1084
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: To explore how individuals reason when they make decisions about participating in colorectal cancer(CRC) screening.Methods: Individuals randomized colorectal cancer (CRC) screeningto FIT or colonoscopy included in the Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) program was invited to focus group discussions and individual telephone interviews. The concept of shared decision-making (SDM: information; values/preferences; involvement) was used as a matrixfor the analyses. To validate findings, additional focus group discussions using the nominal group technique were performed.Results: Lack of knowledge of CRC and CRC screening was prominent for participants and non-participants, while the results differed between the groups in relation to their values and preferences. The influence of significant others promoted participation while it prevented it among non-participants. Those who participated and those who did not made it clear that there was no need to involve health care professionals when making the decision.Conclusions: Based on the results, a display of different ways to spread knowledge and communicate about CRC and CRC-screening could be applied such as, community-based information campaigns, decisions aids, interactive questionnaires, chat-functions and telephone support. The disparity in values and pref-erences between participants and non-participants may be the key to understand why non-participants make theirdecisions not to participate and warrant further exploration.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)

Keyword

colorectal cancer(CRC) screening
decision making
values
preferences
Health-Promoting Work
Hälsofrämjande arbete

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Fritzell, Kaisa
Stake Nilsson, K ...
Jervaeus, Anna
Hultcrantz, Rolf
Wengström, Yvonn ...
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Health Sciences
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
Articles in the publication
European Journal ...
By the university
University of Gävle
Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view