SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Søgaard Karen)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Søgaard Karen) > Development and imp...

Development and implementation of ‘just right’ physical behavior in industrial work based on the Goldilocks Work Principle - a feasibility study

Lerche, Anders Fritz (författare)
The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
Mathiassen, Svend Erik (författare)
Högskolan i Gävle,Arbetshälsovetenskap,Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning
Lund Rasmussen, Charlotte (författare)
The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
visa fler...
Straker, Leon (författare)
Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia
Søgaard, Karen (författare)
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Holtermann, Andreas (författare)
The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-04-28
2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : MDPI. - 1661-7827 .- 1660-4601. ; 18:9
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be redesigned to comprise physical behaviors of different intensities in a composition promoting workers’ health and fitness. This study is the first to assess the feasibility of redesigning work in an industrial setting according to the Goldilocks Work Principle. We recruited workers (n=20) from a brewery in Denmark, and we conducted a participatory 16-week intervention including a workshop and two consultations. The workshop aimed to support the workers in modifying their work, while the consultations assisted the eventual implementation. Feasibility was evaluated as per three aspects: 1) developing modifications of work, 2) implementing these modifications, and 3) changing physical behavior and self-reported fatigue, pain and energy. The three aspects were addressed through records completed by the workers, measurements of workers’ physical behavior and intensity during ‘control’ workdays (i.e., usual work) and ‘intervention’ workdays (i.e. modified work), and self-reported fatigue, pain and energy level following both types of workdays. Five modifications to work were developed, and three of these five modifications were implemented. To some extent, physical behavior and intensity changed as intended during ‘intervention’ workdays compared to ‘control’ workdays. Workers were also less fatigued, had less pain, and had more energy after ‘intervention’ workdays. These results suggest that it is feasible to develop and implement modified work based on the Goldilocks Work Principle among industrial workers. However, we also identified several barriers to the implementation of such modifications.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Occupational Health and Environmental Health (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Physical behavior; Health; Workplace; Intervention; Goldilocks Work Principle
Health-Promoting Work
Hälsofrämjande arbete

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy