SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Søgaard Karen)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Søgaard Karen) > Effectiveness of a ...

Effectiveness of a Goldilocks Work intervention to promote musculoskeletal health among industrial workers – A cluster randomized controlled trial

Lerche, Anders Fritz (författare)
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen
Mathiassen, Svend Erik (författare)
Högskolan i Gävle,Arbetshälsovetenskap,Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning
Lund Rasmmusen, Charlotte (författare)
School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth
visa fler...
Straker, Leon (författare)
School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth
Holtermann, Andreas (författare)
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen
Søgaard, Karen (författare)
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Safety Research. - : Elsevier. - 0022-4375 .- 1879-1247.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Introduction: Industrial workers with physically demanding work have increased risk of musculoskeletal pain. The present 12-week Goldilocks Work intervention aimed to organize work among industrial workers to comprise a ‘just right’ ergonomic balance of physical behaviors (i.e., sit, stand and active) intended to promote musculoskeletal health. The paper investigates the effectiveness of the intervention in reducing low back pain after work.         Methods: 83 workers across 28 workteams in a biotech organization were recruited. Workteams were randomly allocated to receive the intervention or work as usual (control). Intervention workteams implemented the Goldilocks Work planning tool to organize their work tasks towards a predefined ‘just right’ ergonomic balance (i.e., composition of 60% sitting, 30% standing, 10% active work and hourly task alternation). The primary outcome was low back pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were bodily pain, fatigue, physical exertion, productivity and energy after work measured in the survey, and composition and alternations of physical behaviors measured using wearable sensors.  Results: The intervention was delivered almost as planned, with good quality and high adherence among most workteams. However, the intervention did not change physical behaviors towards the intended ‘just right’ ergonomic balance. No significant reduction in low back pain (0.07, CI 95%: -0.68; 0.82), bodily pain (0.10, CI 95%: -0.57; 0.76), tiredness (-0.53, CI 95%: -1.24; 0.19), physical exertion (-0.18, CI 95%: -0.83; 0.48), or improvement in energy (0.39, CI 95%: -1.02; 0.23) or productivity (-0.03, CI 95%: -0.77; 0.72) were found. Conclusion: This Goldilocks Work intervention did not promote musculoskeletal health among industrial workers, and did not change physical behaviors as intended. Thus, more research is needed into implementation strategies to change physical behaviors during productive work towards an evidence-based ‘just right’ ergonomic balance.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Occupational Health and Environmental Health (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Health-Promoting Work
Hälsofrämjande arbete

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy