SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

(WFRF:(Desroches M))
 

Sökning: (WFRF:(Desroches M)) > (2020-2022) > Patients, clinician...

Patients, clinicians and open notes : information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice

Blease, Charlotte (författare)
General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Salmi, Liz (författare)
General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Rexhepi, Hanife, 1984- (författare)
Högskolan i Skövde,Institutionen för informationsteknologi,Forskningsmiljön Informationsteknologi,Informationssystem (IS), Information Systems
visa fler...
Hägglund, Maria, Lektor, 1975- (författare)
Karolinska Institutet,Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för kvinnors och barns hälsa,Department of Women's and Children's Studies, Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
DesRoches, Catherine M. (författare)
General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-05-14
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Ethics. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0306-6800 .- 1473-4257. ; 48:10, s. 785-793
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • In many countries, including patients are legally entitled to request copies of their clinical notes. However, this process remains time-consuming and burdensome, and it remains unclear how much of the medical record must be made available. Online access to notes offers a way to overcome these challenges and in around 10 countries worldwide, via secure web-based portals, many patients are now able to read at least some of the narrative reports written by clinicians (’open notes’). However, even in countries that have implemented the practice many clinicians have resisted the idea remaining doubtful of the value of opening notes, and anticipating patients will be confused or anxious by what they read. Against this scepticism, a growing body of qualitative and quantitative research reveals that patients derive multiple benefits from reading their notes. We address the contrasting perceptions of this practice innovation, and claim that the divergent views of patients and clinicians can be explained as a case of epistemic injustice. Using a range of evidence, we argue that patients are vulnerable to (oftentimes, non-intentional) epistemic injustice. Nonetheless, we conclude that the marginalisation of patients’ access to their health information exemplifies a form of epistemic exclusion, one with practical and ethical consequences including for patient safety.

Ämnesord

HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Etik (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Ethics (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Information Systems (hsv//eng)
HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Filosofi (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Philosophy (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Annan medicin och hälsovetenskap -- Övrig annan medicin och hälsovetenskap (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Other Medical and Health Sciences -- Other Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere specified (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

open notes
patients
EHR
Information Systems
Informationssystem (IS)
INF301 Data Science
INF301 Data Science

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy