Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:his-23329" >
We Need to Talk abo...
-
Pistone, Isabella,1987Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori,Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science
(author)
We Need to Talk about Knowledge! Rethinking Management and Evidence-Based Practice in Welfare
- Article/chapterEnglish2023
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
-
University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration,2023
-
electronicrdacarrier
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:his-23329
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23329URI
-
https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v27i3.14164DOI
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/328789URI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED© 2023 Isabella Pistone, Thomas Andersson, Morten Seger and School of Public Administration
-
New Public Management (NPM) and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) are two fundamental concepts within welfare professions. Both NPM and EBP are central to many debates within welfare, and often criticised as posing simplified or positivist approaches to management and knowledge utilization. Epistemologically, both are manifestations of modernity, with its emphases on standardization, control, simple causality and measurability. These epistemological similarities have not been explored as potential doorways for making modifications to NPM and EBP. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to new ways of thinking and doing management and EBP of complex welfare issues by increasing the epistemological understanding of these concepts. NPM and EBP are taken here as subjects for joint conceptual analysis. The paper is guided by the following question: What is an appropriate epistemology for professionals involved in EBP and managing? Literature on NPM and EBP are analyzed together with theoretical insights from scholarship on formalization and heterogeneity of expertise, and analyzed in light of empirical examples taken from a case of a subregional social sustainability/public health initiative. Drawing on the development of post-NPM and more complex versions of EBP, the paper ends by introducing the notion post-EBP, and concludes by outlining some implications of this concept for the working professions.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Andersson, Thomas,1970-Högskolan i Skövde,Institutionen för handel och företagande,Forskningsmiljön Organisering för hållbar utveckling,Medarbetarskap och Organisatorisk resiliens, Followership and Organizational Resilience(Swepub:his)anet
(author)
-
Sager, Morten,1972Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori,Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science(Swepub:gu)xsagmo
(author)
-
Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration: University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration27:3, s. 37-562001-74052001-74132000-8058
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database