SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hv-15739"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hv-15739" > Exploring grinding ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Karthick Raaj, R.VIT, School of Mechanical Engineering,Vellore, India (IND) (author)

Exploring grinding and burnishing as surface post-treatment options for electron beam additive manufactured Alloy 718

  • Article/chapterEnglish2020

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Elsevier BV,2020
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:hv-15739
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-15739URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126063DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Funders: Aeronautics Research and Development Board[ARDB/01/2031894/M/I]
  • Numerous additive manufacturing (AM) techniques have been developed over the past decade. Features like immense freedom of intricate part design and shorter lead time make AM routes promising for a wide range of applications spanning aerospace, marine and automobile sectors. Among the various metal AM processes, Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing (EBAM) is being widely explored to realise the potential of Ni-based superalloys and Ti alloys for varied high-performance applications. A novel attempt has been made in this paper to assess the surface integrity of as-built EBAM nickel-based superalloy 718 (AB) subjected to grinding (G), Low Plasticity Burnishing (LPB) and their sequential combination. Apart from their influence on sub-surface microstructures, the effect of process variables during the above post-treatments on the residual stress profiles was also investigated. Results revealed that G + LPB results in about 0.6 ÎŒm lower surface roughness, 17% improved microhardness compared to AB + LPB, and higher compressive surface residual stress as compared to LPB processed EBAM samples. The sequential grinding and LPB - improved microhardness, was also found to extend about 500 ÎŒm more when compared to the LPB process. The G + LPB, which is greatly influenced by the prior grinding, smoothens the surface and thus results in a better surface finish. Highest hardness, superior surface finish, reduced porosity and improved compressive residual stress were observed in samples that adopted the AB + G + LPB sequence over other samples, with the LPB step at 40 MPa yielding the best results. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Vijay Anirudh, P.Anna University, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering, Chennai, India (IND) (author)
  • Karunakaran, C.VIT, School of Mechanical Engineering,Vellore, India (IND) (author)
  • Kannan, C.VIT, School of Mechanical Engineering,Vellore, India (IND) (author)
  • Jahagirdar, AdwaitAnna University, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering, Chennai, India (IND) (author)
  • Joshi, Shrikant V.,1960-Högskolan Väst,Forskningsmiljön produktionsteknik(PTW),PTW(Swepub:hv)shrjos (author)
  • Balan, A. S. S.NIT, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Surathkal, Karnataka, India (IND) (author)
  • VIT, School of Mechanical Engineering,Vellore, India (IND)Anna University, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering, Chennai, India (IND) (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Surface & Coatings Technology: Elsevier BV3970257-89721879-3347

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view