SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Forssten Seiser Anette 1965 )
 

Search: WFRF:(Forssten Seiser Anette 1965 ) > Building infrastruc...

Building infrastructures for collegial planning and preparation : A model for subject-didactic school development

Liljekvist, Yvonne, 1967- (author)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för matematik och datavetenskap (from 2013),Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education Research (SMEER)
Nordgren, Kenneth, 1962- (author)
Karlstads universitet,Centrum för de samhällsvetenskapliga ämnenas didaktik (from 2013),Institutionen för samhälls- och kulturvetenskap (from 2013)
Randahl, Ann-Christin (author)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för språk, litteratur och interkultur (from 2013)
show more...
Kristiansson, Martin (author)
Karlstads universitet,Centrum för de samhällsvetenskapliga ämnenas didaktik (from 2013)
Forssten Seiser, Anette, 1965- (author)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för pedagogiska studier (from 2013)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021
2021
English.
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This paper will present an ongoing research project in a Swedish national programme for cooperation between schools and universities (www.kau.se/ulf ). The aim is to provide knowledge regarding how teachers plan and prepare lessons (PaP) in different subjects so that those techniques can be modelled. Further, by comparing different subjects, we will also learn more about the way in which disciplinary boundaries affect the planning process. RQ: How does collegial cooperation affect the practice and the quality of teacher planning and preparation? PaP is vital for high-quality in teaching and thus for student learning (Hattie, 2008; Mertens et al., 2010). Nevertheless, the infrastructure to support PaP is often poorly developed. In Sweden, as in many other countries, PaP is mainly the responsibility of individual teachers, disconnected from the local school organisation (Darling-Hammond & Rothman, 2011; Ellegård & Vrotsou, 2013; OECD, 2020). Indications of deficiencies in such infrastructures include fragmentation of time for planning, absence of functional collaborative settings, lack of routines and relevant input of new knowledge (Nordgren et al.,2019). This project bring together the fields of subject didactic (e.g. Hudson, 2016) and school development (e.g. Jarl, Blossing, & Andersson, 2017). We argue that PaP is a key to school development and that subject specific knowledge and skills associated with good PaP should be at the centre of teacher professional development (cf. Carlgren, 1999; Deng, 2018) to meet the challenges having creativity, literacy, and critical thinking as central aspects of teaching.In our presentation we will discuss how possibilities and restrains in the collegial setting affect the subject-oriented planning teams. We draw on data from planning team meetings (audio recordings, planning documents, etc.). Subject specific, as well as generic variation in the planning teams’ activity enhance our knowledge on how such designated communities can support PaP.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap -- Didaktik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences -- Didactics (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Planning and preparing of teaching
Comparative subject didactics
Swedish
History
Mathematics
Pedagogiskt arbete
Educational Work
Matematikdidaktik
Mathematics didactics
History
Historia
Risk and Environmental Studies
Risk- och miljöstudier

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
kon (subject category)

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view