SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Lindskog H.)
 

Search: WFRF:(Lindskog H.) > On the Evaluation o...

On the Evaluation of Privacy Impact Assessment and Privacy Risk Assessment Methodologies : A Systematic Literature Review

Wairimu, Samuel, 1988- (author)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för matematik och datavetenskap (from 2013)
Iwaya, Leonardo H (author)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för matematik och datavetenskap (from 2013),Privacy and Security (PriSec) Research Group
Fritsch, Lothar, 1970- (author)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för matematik och datavetenskap (from 2013),Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway,Privacy and Security (PriSec) Research Group
show more...
Lindskog, Stefan, 1967- (author)
Karlstads universitet,Institutionen för matematik och datavetenskap (from 2013),Privacy and Security (PriSec) Research Group
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
IEEE, 2024
2024
English.
In: IEEE Access. - : IEEE. - 2169-3536. ; 12, s. 19625-19650
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Assessing privacy risks and incorporating privacy measures from the onset requires a comprehensive understanding of potential impacts on data subjects. Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) offer a systematic methodology for such purposes, which are closely related to Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), particularly outlined in Article 35 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The core of a PIA is a Privacy Risk Assessment (PRA). PRAs can be integrated as part of full-fledged PIAs or independently developed to support PIA processes. Although these methodologies have been identified as essential enablers of privacy by design, their effectiveness has been criticized because of the lack of evidence of their rigorous and systematic evaluation. Hence, we conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify published PIA and PRA methodologies and assess how and to what extent they have been scientifically validated or evaluated. We found that these methodologies are rarely evaluated for their performance in practice, and most of them have only been validated in limited studies. Most validation evidence is found with PRA methodologies. Of the evaluated methodologies, PIAs were the most evaluated, where case studies were the predominant evaluation method. These evaluated methodologies can be easily transferred to an industrial setting or used by practitioners, as they provide evidence of their use in practice. In addition, the findings in this study can be used to inform researchers of the current state-of-the-art, and practitioners can understand the benefits and current limitations of the methodologies and adopt evidence-based practices. 

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Privacy impact assessment
data protection impact assessment
general data protection regulation
privacy by design
privacy
review
threat modeling
privacy risks
validity
maturity.
Computer Science
Datavetenskap

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Wairimu, Samuel, ...
Iwaya, Leonardo ...
Fritsch, Lothar, ...
Lindskog, Stefan ...
About the subject
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Computer and Inf ...
Articles in the publication
IEEE Access
By the university
Karlstad University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view